SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 77

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
G.Subhashini – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 2331/2014



##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:2078

APHC010605632014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 2331/2014

Between:

1. G .SUBHASHINI, D/O. G.VENKATASUBBAIAH, W/O. B.SIVA

SANKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O.

D.NO.3/126, NEAR M.P.P.SCHOOL, BAKARAPURAM, KOTLURU,

VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN, CHILDREN

(ICDS), DISABLED & SENIOR CITIZENS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,

HYDERABAD.

2. T HE DIRECTOR, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT & CHILD WELFARE

DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD.

3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R DISTRICT, KADAPA.

4. T HE PROJECT DIRECTOR, ICDS, KADAPA RURAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

5. B VARALAKSHMI, W/O. A.VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 25

YEARS, OCC: AGANWADI WORKER, R/O. HOUSE NO.1/113,

KOTHURU, VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in

##PAGE2##

2

2026:APHC:2078

nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No.579/I.C.D.S/2013

dated 28-12-2013 issued by respondent No.4 appointing the respondent No.5

as an Anganwadi Worker, Bhakarapuram Anganwadi Centre, Bakarapuram,

Vallur Mandal, Y.S.R District as arbitrary, quite illegal, colorable exercise of

power and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under

Articles 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the

proceedings No.579/I.C.D.S/2013 dated 28-12-2013 issued by respondent

No.4

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 2834 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to

suspend the proceedings No.579/I.C.D.S/2013 dated 28-12-2013 issued by

respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to

receive the counter copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the

above writ petition and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V R REDDY KOVVURI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE

The Court made the following:

##PAGE3##

3

2026:APHC:2078

Order:-

The petitioner is challenging the appointment of the 5th respondent as

Anganwadi worker and seeks a direction to set aside the order of appointment

dated 28.12.2013 issued by the 4th respondent.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner secured more

marks as compared to the 5th respondent in the 10th class examination. It is

also submitted that though the 5th respondent is not a native of Bakarapuram

Village, she had applied for the post of Anganwadi worker. It is submitted that

the notification issued by the respondent authority mandates that the

applicants should be residents of Bakarapuram Village for being eligible to

apply for the post of Anganwadi worker. It is submitted that the 4th respondent

has ignored the basic criteria for selection and preferred the 5th respondent

though the petitioner is more meritorious.

3. The respondent Nos.1 to 4 have filed a counter and it is stated in the

counter that the District Selection Committee had considered all the

applications and based on the performance of the applicants during the

interview, the Selection Committee awarded marks to the applicants as per

G.O.Ms.No.15. It is submitted that the 5th respondent secured the highest

marks in the selection process and she was appointed as Anganwadi worker.

It is also submitted that the Selection Committee consists of senior officers

and no bias can be alleged against the petitioner. The marks awarded to each

of the applicants were also displayed and the respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top