HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
G.Subhashini – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 2331/2014
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:2078
APHC010605632014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 2331/2014
Between:
1. G .SUBHASHINI, D/O. G.VENKATASUBBAIAH, W/O. B.SIVA
SANKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O.
D.NO.3/126, NEAR M.P.P.SCHOOL, BAKARAPURAM, KOTLURU,
VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN, CHILDREN
(ICDS), DISABLED & SENIOR CITIZENS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,
HYDERABAD.
2. T HE DIRECTOR, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT & CHILD WELFARE
DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD.
3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R DISTRICT, KADAPA.
4. T HE PROJECT DIRECTOR, ICDS, KADAPA RURAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
5. B VARALAKSHMI, W/O. A.VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 25
YEARS, OCC: AGANWADI WORKER, R/O. HOUSE NO.1/113,
KOTHURU, VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:2078
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No.579/I.C.D.S/2013
dated 28-12-2013 issued by respondent No.4 appointing the respondent No.5
as an Anganwadi Worker, Bhakarapuram Anganwadi Centre, Bakarapuram,
Vallur Mandal, Y.S.R District as arbitrary, quite illegal, colorable exercise of
power and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under
Articles 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the
proceedings No.579/I.C.D.S/2013 dated 28-12-2013 issued by respondent
No.4
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 2834 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
suspend the proceedings No.579/I.C.D.S/2013 dated 28-12-2013 issued by
respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
receive the counter copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the
above writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:2078
Order:-
The petitioner is challenging the appointment of the 5th respondent as
Anganwadi worker and seeks a direction to set aside the order of appointment
dated 28.12.2013 issued by the 4th respondent.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner secured more
marks as compared to the 5th respondent in the 10th class examination. It is
also submitted that though the 5th respondent is not a native of Bakarapuram
Village, she had applied for the post of Anganwadi worker. It is submitted that
the notification issued by the respondent authority mandates that the
applicants should be residents of Bakarapuram Village for being eligible to
apply for the post of Anganwadi worker. It is submitted that the 4th respondent
has ignored the basic criteria for selection and preferred the 5th respondent
though the petitioner is more meritorious.
3. The respondent Nos.1 to 4 have filed a counter and it is stated in the
counter that the District Selection Committee had considered all the
applications and based on the performance of the applicants during the
interview, the Selection Committee awarded marks to the applicants as per
G.O.Ms.No.15. It is submitted that the 5th respondent secured the highest
marks in the selection process and she was appointed as Anganwadi worker.
It is also submitted that the Selection Committee consists of senior officers
and no bias can be alleged against the petitioner. The marks awarded to each
of the applicants were also displayed and the respo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.