HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY,Tuhin Kumar Gedela
Dabbugottu Srinivasulu – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India – Respondent
WP 2408/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:APHC:1922
APHC010038932026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3558]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2408/2026
Between:
1. D ABBUGOTTU SRINIVASULU,, S/O. D.CHINA KONDAIAH. AGED
ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 15-6-115, FLAT NO.202,BALAJI
RESIDENCY, VENKATARAMAPURAM, SPSR NELLORE-524
004,ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER
AND
1. U NION BANK OF INDIA, Dargamitta Branch-3, Dargamitta, Near
Rainbow Theatre, Grand Trunk Road, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra
Pradesh - 524003.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in
the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent bank in
publishing auction notice on 11.01.2026, fixing auction date to be held on
28.01.2026, without serving sale notice to me and without affixing the same
on subject property which is required under proviso to Rule 9 (1) of
Secularization Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, and inaction of Debt
Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam in considering the Interlocutory
Applications I.A.Nos.394, 395, 396 and 397 of 2026 in S.A.No.351 of 2025,
particularly in view of the imminent threat of creation of third-party interests
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:1922
through illegal auction as arbitrary, illegal, violative of provisions of the
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI), violative of Securitization Interest
(Enforcement) Rules, 2002, devoid of principles of natural justice and
unconstitutional, and consequently direct the respondent not to conduct
auction or issue sale certificate for the auction to be held on 28.01.2026, until
the disposal of I.A.Nos.394, 395, 396 and 397 of 2026 in S.A.No.351 of 2025,
by DRT, Visakhapatnam
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the publication of
auction notice dated 28.01.2026, , pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:1922
The Court made the following:
ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is the principal borrower. He has filed the writ petition
for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent-bank in publishing
auction notice dated 11.01.2026 fixing the date of auction on 28.01.2026
without serving sale notice on the petitioner and without affixing the same on
the subject property as required under proviso Rule 9(1) of the Security
Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and the inaction on the part of the Debts
Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam in considering the interlocutory
applications in I.A.Nos.394 to 397 of 2026 in S.A.No.351 of 2025 in view of the
imminent threat of creating a third party interest in respect of the secured
interest as illegal and violative of provisions of the Securitisation and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,
2002 (for short “the SARFAESI Act”) and consequently sought direction to the
respondent not to conduct auction or issue sale certificate for the auction to be
held on 28.01.2026 till the disposal of the aforesaid interlocutory applications.
3. The petitioner has already approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal,
Visakhapatnam, which is the appropriate forum constituted under the special
enactment with special mechanism challenging the measures initiated by the
respondent-bank for realization of the loan amount. Therefore, as the
petitioner has already approached the appropriat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.