2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16208
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B KRISHNA MOHAN
Smt. Katike Rajjab Bee – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 251/2022
APHC010529192021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3233]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 251/2022 Between:
1. S MT. KATIKE RAJJAB BEE,, W/O. K. RAMJAN SAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, D.NO. 5/74, RALLADODDI VILLAGE, KADIMETLA, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND
1. S TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. T HE TAHSILDAR, GONEGANDLA, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in including the petitioner's land in Sy.No.628/A to an extent of Ac. 1.31 cents situated at Gonegandla Village, Gonegandla Mandal, of Kurnool District in RSR Register/revenue records as dotted land and the further action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's claim petition dated 30- 03 2021 submitted under Section 3 and 4 of the Andhra Pradesh dotted lands (Updation in Re-settlement Register) Act, 2017 seeking deletion of her above said land in RSR Register/revenue records as dotted land, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to delete petitioner's land in Sy.No.628/A to an extent of Ac. 1.31 cents situated at Gonegandla Village, Gonegandla Mandal, Kurnool Districtin RSR Register/revenue records as dotted land and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the respondents to consider the claim petition dated 30-03-2021 submitted by the petitioner under Section 3 & 4 of the Andhra Pradesh dotted lands (Updation in Re-settlement Register) Act, 2017, seeking deletion of her land in Sy.No.628/A to an extent of Ac. 1.31 cents situated at Gonegandla Village, Gonegandla Mandal, of Kurnool District as dotted land in RSR Register/Revenue Records pending disposal of above writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the 4th Respondent in Writ Petition No.251 of 2022 to file the counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass.
Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in including the petitioner’s land in Sy.No.628/A to an extent of Ac.1.31 cents situated at Gonegandla village, Gonegandla Mandal, Kurnool District in RSR Register/ revenue records as dotted land and the further action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s claim petition dated 30.03.2021 submitted under Section 3 & 4 of the Andhra Pradesh dotted lands (Updation in Re-settlement Register) Act, 2017 seeking deletion of her above said land in RSR Register/ revenue records as dotted land.
3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents relying upon the counter of the 4th respondent submits that, the claim petition of the petitioner dated 30.03.2021 will be disposed of by the 2nd respondent by following the due procedure.
4. In vie