Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SMT V.SUJATHA, J
PUSAPATI VENKATA NARAYANA RAJU – Appellant
Versus
PISINI VENKATA RAO VENKANNA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amendments can be made to adjust the nature of a suit as needed. (Para 1 , 5 , 21) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioner's counsel emphasize the necessity of amending pleadings. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. guidelines for allowing amendments focus on minimizing injustice and litigation. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. the court's decision reinstated the petitioner's right to amend the plaint. (Para 23) |
ORDER
This civil revision petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01.11.2024 passed in I.A.No.336 of 2024 in O.S.No.337 of 2015 by the III Additional Junior Civil Judge (Excise) Vizianagaram, whereby, the Trial Court dismissed the said interlocutory application filed Under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short “C.P.C.”) to permit the petitioner/plaintiff to amend the plaint.
2) For the sake of convenience, the parties to the revision will hereinafter be referred as petitioner and defendants, as arrayed before the Trial Court in I.A.No.336 of 2024.
3) The petitioner-plaintiff initially filed O.S.No.337 of 2015 as against the respondents for permanent injunction restraining them from interfering wi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
