APHC010076452026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3521]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4334/2026 Between:

Anki Reddamma, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No 4 under the guise of 5th respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property belongs to the petitioner in Sy No 350/9 3501OA 35011 35012 35013 3502A2 3503 3505 3506 3507 and 3508 to an extent of Ac 1 9 cents in Sy No 6173 to an extent of Ac 0 55 cents in Sy No 635/2B1B to an extent of Ac 1 03 cents in Sy No 6381 to an extent of Ac 0 11 and in Sy Nos 624 624/1 624/2 6243 6251 627 628A1 to an extent of Ac 1 151 total to an extent of Ac 5 01 cents is illegal arbitrary and oppose to Article 300A of the Constitution of India consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property belongs to the petitioner in Sy No 350/9 3501OA 35011 350 12 35013 3502A2 3503 3505 3506 3507 and 3508 to an extent of Ac 1 9 cents in Sy No 6173 to an extent of Ac 0 55 cents in Sy No 635/2B1B to an extent of Ac 1 03 cents in Sy No 6381 to an extent of Ac 0 11 and in Sy Nos 624 624/1 624/2 6243 6251 627 628A1 to an extent of Ac 1 151 total to an extent of Ac 5 01 cents and to pass such other order(s)…”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

3. Sri P. Ajay Babu, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that after conducting preliminary enquiry, it was noticed that the complaint is of civil nature.

4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to invoke appropriate civil remedy against the 5^th respondent.

5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.4334 of 2026