HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Anbar Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRLP 12341/2025
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:4455
APHC010640932025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3396]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12341/2025
Between:
1. A NBAR KHAN, S/O. SALIM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. 68 GA,
HIRANA MARG VILLAGE,JAMNER,TEHSIL SHAJAPUR, MADHYA
PRADESH
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its public prosecutor,High
Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying
that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal
Petition, the High CourtPleased to release the petitioner/Accused-1 on bail in SC
.NDPS 457 of 2023, in crime no. 176 of 2021 Yelamachili Rural Police Station,
Anakapalli District on the file I Additonal District & Sessions Judge-Special Judge for
Trial of Offences Under NDPS Act, Visakhpatnam and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:4455
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12341 of 2025
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has
been filed by the petitioner herein/Accused No.1, seeking regular bail, in
Crime No.176 of 2021 of Yelamanchili Rural Police Station, Anakapalli District,
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 read
with 8(C) of the NDPS Act.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief, is that, on 16.09.2021, this
petitioner and other accused were found in possession of 224 kgs of Ganja
while they were transporting the same. When the police persons detained this
petitioner and other accused, the petitioner escaped from the place of seizure.
Subsequently, he was arrested on 19.08.2025.
3. Heard Sri Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor
on behalf of the State.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was
arrested on 19.08.2025, since then, he has been in judicial custody. He would
further submit that the petitioner is innocent and the petitioner is ready to
furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the Court. Learned counsel for the
petitioner finally prays for grant of bail to the petitioner by imposing any
conditions.
##PAGE3##3
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the investigation
is not yet completed. The quantity of contraband involved in present crime is
224 Kgs of Ganja, which is a commercial quantity. The Statutory period of 180
days is not over. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor finally prays for
dismissal of the petition in the light of the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act.
6. The Hon’ble Apex Court in State of Kerala v. Rajesh, 2026:APHC:4455 at Paragraph
Nos.8, 19, 20 and 21 held as under:
8. To curb the spread of dangerous drugs, Parliament has
mandated that an accused under the NDPS Act cannot be granted
bail unless there are reasonable grounds to believe he is not guilty
and will not commit offences while on bail. The High Court failed to
justify ignoring these mandatory conditions when releasing the
accused. Instead of considering the grave socio-economic and
health consequences of illegal drug trafficking, the court ought to
have enforced the law in the spirit intended by Parliament.
19. Section 37 imposes additional, overriding restrictions on the
grant of bail, beyond those under Section 439 CrPC, through its non
obstante clause. It prohibits bail unless two mandatory conditions
are met: the prosecution is given an opportunity to oppose, and the
court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the
accused is not guilty. If either condition is not fulfilled, the bar
against granting bail applies.
20.The term “reasonable grounds” requires more than mere
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.