HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
B Ashok reddy – Appellant
Versus
Prl.Secy. Revenue dept. – Respondent
WP 44700/2017
##PAGE1##
::1::
2025:APHC:57849
APHC011026522017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU
NIMMAGADDA
Review IA No. 1 and I.A.No.2 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO: 44700/2017
Between:
1. B ASHOK REDDY, S/O B. THIPPANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT
59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.261, KANAKASRI
NILAYA, FLAT NO.7, NIJALINGAPPA LAYOUT, NEARBY
NATIONAL CONVENT, DEVNAGERE TOWN, DEVNAGERE
DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. P RL SECY REVENUE DEPT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA
PRADESH REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVAHTI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH STATE.
2. T HE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR, . ANANTAPURAMU
DISTRICT.
3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTAPUR,
ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
##PAGE2##::2::
2025:APHC:57849
4. T HE TAHSILDAR, VAJRAKARURU MANDAL,
ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
5. S MT R GOWRAMMA, D/O LATE RACHANA GOUD, AGED
ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O C/O P.
SHANKAR GOUD, GULAPALYAM (VIL), VAJRAKARURU
MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
6. P PAMPANA GOUD, S/O LATE RACHANA GOUD AGED
ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE R/O C/O P.
SHANKAR GOUD, GULAPALYAM (VIL), VAJRAKARURU
MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Pleased to review the order dated 16-08-2023 passed in Writ
Petition No. 44700/2017 and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH C KRISHNA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. B S VENKATA RAMESH
##PAGE3##::3::
2025:APHC:57849
Reserved on : 19.11.2025
Pronounced on : 31.12.2025
Uploaded on : 02.01.2026
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Review I.A.No.1 and I.A.No.2 of 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION No.44700 of 2017
Review I.A.No.1 of 2023
This court made the following
ORDER
The present review application is filed by the writ petitioner
praying that the orders dated 16.08.2023 passed by this Hon’ble
Court in W.P.No.44700 of 2017 to be reviewed.
2. This Hon’ble Court passed orders dated 16.08.2023 in
W.P.No.44700 of 2017 as under:
“16. The unofficial respondents/Respondent Nos.5 & 6 happen to
be the offspring of late P. Rachana Gowd. Meanwhile, the
petitioner acquired the property in question from P. Kumar Gowd,
who is also a son of the deceased P. Rachana Gowd. Notably, P.
Rachana Gowd is deceased. Evidently, a significant conflict
regarding the title and ownership of the subject property has
arisen between the petitioner and Respondent Nos.5 & 6.
17. It is to be noted that, the petitioner has been seeking a relief
with regard to change of entries in the revenue records only on the
##PAGE4##::4::
basis of Agreement of Sale. That itself indicates that there is any
amount of dispute about the possession and title of the petitioner
particularly in view of the matter being seriously disputed by
Respondent Nos.5 & 6. In other words, maintaining this writ
petition means indirectly seeking the verdict on the disputed
question of title and possession which has to be dissuaded by all
means. Therefore, this question of title and possession is purely in
the nature of question of fact but cannot be decided by an
authority like the official respondents. Until and unless the title of
such a disputed property is decided one way or the other,
necessary changes of entries in the revenue record cannot be
effected by the revenue officials under the Act. Hence, it is
expedient for the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court
in order to get the title dispute settled in his favour and then only
approach the authorities under the Act for appropriate relief.”
3. Learned counsel for the review petitioner sought for review of
the order of this Court on the ground that in view of ratio laid down by
erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Ratnamma Vs The
Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram, Ananthapur District
in W.P. No. 21689 of 1999, dated 24.07.2015, no appeal under
Section 5(5) of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act,
1971 (for short “the Act”) is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.