SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16315

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
K SUBRAMANYAM RAJU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


APHC010299312023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 15352/2023 Between:

1. K SUBRAMANYAM RAJU, S/O LATE NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O AMBIKAPURAM VILLAGE, VARADIAHPALEM MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT

4. T HE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, , VARADIAHPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus a)declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the 2nd Respondent and 4th Respondent in not mutating the Adangal and ROR-1B and not issuing Pattadhar Passboo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top