SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16393

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY,Tuhin Kumar Gedela
The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal – Appellant
Versus
G. Naga Malleshwara Rao – Respondent
WP 20585/2016



IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AT AMARAVATI *****

WRIT PETITION NOS: 17491 OF 2017, 36287 OF 2014, 20575 OF 2016, 20582 OF

2016, 20585 OF 2016 AND 24403 OF 2016 Between The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home (Services) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District and 2 others.

.. Petitioner and

1.U.J.Narasimhulu, S/o. Late Chinna Narasimhulu, aged 42 years, working as Police Constable PC-65, Revanur P.S. Koilakuntla Mandal, Kurnool District and 5 others.

.. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 04.12.2025 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

1. Whether Reporters of Local Yes/No newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment Yes/No may be marked to Law Reports/Journals?

3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship Yes/No wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

____________________________________

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J ______________________

TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J * THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA + WRIT PETITION NOS: 17491 OF 2017, 36287 OF 2014, 20575 OF 2016, 20582 OF 2016, 20585 OF 2016 AND 24403 OF 2016 % DATE: 04.12.2025 # The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home (Services) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District and 2 others.

... Petitioner Vs.

$ 1. U.J.Narasimhulu, S/o. Late Chinna Narasimhulu, aged 42 years, working as Police Constable PC-65, Revanur P.S. Koilakuntla Mandal, Kurnool District and 5 others.

... Respondents ! Counsel for the petitioner : Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I ^Counsel for respondents : Mr. G.V.Shivaji Gist:

 Head Note:

? CASES REFERRED: NIL.

APHC010643102017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3558]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NOS: 17491 OF 2017, 36287 OF 2014, 20575 OF 2016, 20582 OF 2016, 20585 OF 2016 AND 24403 OF 2016 WRIT PETITION NO: 17491/2017 Between:

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIAPL SECRETARY, HOME (SERVICES) DEPARTMENT A.P.

SECRETARIAT. VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. U J NARASIMHULU, S/O LATE CHINNA NARASIRRIHULU, AGED 42 YEARS, WORKING AS POLICE CONSTABLE PC-65 REVANUR P.S.

KOILAKUNTLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

2. D ANJANEYULU, S/O SAYANNA, AGED 40 YEARS WORKING AS POLICE CONSTABLE PC-111 KOILAKUNTLA P. S.. KURNOOL DISTRICT.

3. N C VENKATA REDDY, S/O LATE N.SANJIVA REDDY AGED 46 YEARS, WORKING AS POLICE CONSTABLE PC-2363 KOILAKUNTLA P.S. KURNOOL DISTRICT.

4. V RAMANIAH, S,/O LATE SIVANNA, AGED 46 YEARS, WORKING AS POLICE CONSTABLE PC-25 GOSUPACTU P.S. KURNOOL DISTRICT.

5. M NAGESWARA RAO, S/O LATE UDDANDI, AGED 44 YEARS WORKING AS POLICE CONSTABLE PC-58 VELGODU P.S.

KURNOOL DISTRICT

6. THE A P ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, PURANI HAVELI, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OE CERTIORARI calling for the records relating to in connection with the orders dated 22-03-2016 in 0..A.No.7041 2012 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and to quash or set aside the same as erroneous in excess of jurisdiction and contrary to law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 21361 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the orders dated 22-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top