SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16482

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
Shaik Usman – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 32279/2025



APHC010623192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3208]

AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32279/2025 Between:

1. S HAIK USMAN,, S/O. SHAIK UMAR MIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O.46/149-1, BUDAVARAPETA, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL.

2. S HAIK CHAND BASHA,, S/O. SHAIK UMAR MIAH, AGED

55 YEARS, R/O. 46/152-D, BUDAVARAPETA, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

4. T HE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. TADELA RADHAMMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.32279 of 2025

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…..to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners for mutation of their names in Revenue Records and issue New Pattadar passbooks and Title deeds pursuant to representation dated 13.10.2025 to the respondents 2 and 4 respectively as illegal arbitrary and contrary to Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass books Act, 1971 and A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass book Rules, 1989 and violative of Article 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.….”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

3. The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that despite submitting a representation dated 13.10.2025 seeking for mutation of their names in revenue records and issue of pattadar pass books and title deeds, in respect of the subject land, no orders have been passed so far. Hence, the present writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader has submitted that the application for mutation of names in revenue records and issue of pattadar pass books and title deeds has to be made through online.

5. Considering the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, by granting liberty to the petitioners to submit an online application within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt of such application, the respondent authorities shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 20.11.2025 Ivd THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.32279 of 2025 Dated: 20.11.2025 Ivd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top