Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
T SARASWATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners claim for continuation of service. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding applicability of the amendment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. court's interpretation of service regulations. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. decision on the legal implications of age of superannuation. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling to allow petitioners to continue till age 62. (Para 19) |
COMMON ORDER:
The common question in all the three writ petitions is that the Petitioners are seeking for continuation of their service till attaining the age of 62 years in terms of the amendment brought into the Andhra Pradesh Public Employee (Regulation of Superannuation) Act, 1984 vide G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV- FR&LR) Department, dated 31.01.2022.
2. The Petitioners are employees of Mahatma Jyothiba Phule Andhra Pradesh Backward Class Welfare Residential Institution Society (for brevity „MJPAPBCWRIS‟). It is stated that the Society is under the control of the State Government and pursuant to the Amendment to the Andhra Pradesh Public Employee (Regulation of Superannuation) Act, 1984, the age of superannuation was also enhanced to the employees of the Respondent-Society vide G.O.Ms.No.60, School Education (TRG) Depart
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
