SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 1095

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
N.Subbarayudu – Appellant
Versus
The A.P. Mineral Development Corporation Ltd – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

Heard Sri L.J. Veera Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri N. Jeevan Kumar, learned Counsel for the Respondents.

2. Common facts and common issues are involved in the present batch of Writ Petitions. Therefore, for the purpose of narration of facts, the facts mentioned in W.P.No.27043 of 2014 are referred to in this Order.

3. The Prayer in Writ Petition No.27043 of 2014 is as follows:

“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble High Court may be pleased, to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 3rd respondent in directing the petitioner to vacate and handover the possession of land of 0.54 Acres in Sy. No. 39/10 of Mangampet Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, Y.S.R.District vide notice under Ref. No. APMDC/LA/StructuresNotice/ dated 10.12.2013 though award is dated 04.09.2002 as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and against statutory provisions including Sec 24(2) of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and resettlement Act, 2013 and consequently set- aside the notice issued by the 3rd respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top