HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J
UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VUTLA PRASAD S/O ANJANEYULU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accident caused by negligent driving resulting in injury. (Para 1 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. claims for adequate compensation based on evidence. (Para 14) |
| 3. statutory guidance emphasizes probabilistic assessment in accident cases. (Para 20 , 32) |
| 4. legal obligation to ensure just compensation. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Introductory:
1. Respondent No.3 in M.V.O.P.No.473 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District Judge (FTC), Ongole (for short, “the learned MACT”), filed the present appeal questioning the Award dated 19.03.2013 passed by the learned MACT, whereunder the petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming a compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- for the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident was partly allowed, awarding a sum of Rs.11,50,000/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition till realization, fastening the liability jointly and severally on the respondents therein.
2. Respondent No.1 herein is the claimant before the learned MACT. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein are the driver and owner of the lorry bearing Registration No. AP 07 U 4129 (hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.