SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 1190

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
MUNAGALA SUBBARAYUDU – Appellant
Versus
T. SRINIVASA REDDY AND ANOTHER – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

Introductory:

1. The claimant in M.V.O.P.No.68 of 1999, dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded in a sum of Rs.81,265/- as against the claim made for Rs.3,00,000/- under decree and order dated 28.11.2001 passed by the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- I Additional District Judge, Guntur (for short “the learned MACT”), filed the present appeal.

2. Both the respondents remained ex parte before the learned MACT. However, in this appeal, respondent No.2 / Insurance Company is represented by Smt. A. Jayanthi, learned counsel.

3. Heard both sides.

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as the claimant and the respondents as and how they are arrayed before the learned MACT.

Case of the claimant:

5(i). The claimant was working as a regular Mazdoor in the Telephone Department, Chandramoulinagar, Guntur. While he was traveling along with other employees on 20.05.1995 at about 02:30 p.m. in a van bearing No.AP 7T 2738 of the Telephone Department and when the van reached Chintaguntla Village of Markapur Mandal, a vehicle / lorry of respondent No.1 bearing No.AP 10T 2979 (hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”) came in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top