SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 1711

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Vattikuti Satish Babu – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


APHC010077692026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4368/2026 Between:

1. V ATTIKUTI SATISH BABU, S/O BHASKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 47 YRS. BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.1-265, MURALI NAGAR, ALAMURU-

533233. DR BRA KONASEEMA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI-522503. AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DIST.

2. T HE COMMISSIONER PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE MANGALAGIRI-522503. GUNTUR DIST.

3. T HE DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, DR BRA KONASEEMA DISTRICT, AMALAPURAM-533201.

4. T HE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE STATION, ALAMURU-533232. DR BRA KONASEEMA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top