SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 1854

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
BHUKYA PAVANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WP 4272/2026



APHC010073212026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3521]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4272/2026 Between:

1. B HUKYA PAVANI, D/O SRINU, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, R/O.DO.NO. 2-82, CHANDRUPTALA PEDA THANDA, VISSANNAPETA MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. 522238

2. T HE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI. 522503

3. T HE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA.

520002

4. T HE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VISSANNAPETA POLICE STATION NTR DISTRIC 521215 ...RESPONDENT(S):

1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY

1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief:

“…to issue a Writ order or direction one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.4 in not investigating and filing charge sheet in Crime No.101/2025 dated 09.09.2025 of Vissannapeta Police Station, NTR District, despite clear material that the first acts of sexual assault and sexual exploitation were committed against the petitioner when she was a minor, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the mandatory provisions of the POCSO Act, 2012 and direct the respondent No.4 to conduct and complete the investigation in FIR No. 101/2025 dated 09.09.2025 in a time-bound manner and file the charge sheet …”

2. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the charge sheet was filed on 06.11.2025 and the case was numbered as P.R.C. No.18 of 2025 on 29.11.2025.

3. In view of the above, the purpose of filing the Writ Petition stands accomplished.

4. Recording the above submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_________________________

DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4272 of 2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top