SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 1998

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
N. Reddeppa Reddy @ Pedda Reddappa Reddy – Appellant
Versus
N.C. Reddeppa Reddy (Died) – Respondent
SA 1041/2011



HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO S.A.Nos.1041, 955 of 2011 & 1210 of 2012 &

I.A.No.1 of 2026 in/and S.A.No.1040 of 2011

COMMON JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the common judgment and decree dated 06.07.2011 in A.S.No.141 of 2007 and A.S.No.21 of 2008, on the file of the learned VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Madanapalle, reversing the judgment and decree dated 08.10.2007 in O.S.No.440 of 1996, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Piler, the present Second Appeals, i.e., S.A.Nos.1040, 1041 and 955 of 2011 and S.A.No.1210 of 2012, have been filed.

2. Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the parties have arrived at a compromise in respect of the subject matter of these appeals, in terms of the memorandum of compromise dated 27.11.2025, which is the same compromise recorded in the connected Second Appeals i.e., S.A.Nos.1037 and 1080 of 2011 and S.A.No.1138 of 2012.

3. In S.A.No.1040 of 2011, the parties have filed I.A.No.01 of 2026, seeking to record the compromise. In the remaining Second Appeals, namely S.A.No.955 of 2011, S.A.No.1040 of 2011 and S.A.No.1210 of 2012, the parties have filed memos before the Registry requesting that the compromise be recorded.

4. Sri N.Reddappa Reddy @ Pedda Reddappa Reddy and Smt. M.Reddi Rani, who are the parties in these second appeals are present through virtual mode. The learned counsel on record represents that they are old aged persons about 85 years and they are unable to attend the Court physically. They have filed copies of their Aadhaar cards and seek permission of this Court to appear through virtual mode. Permission is accorded. The remaining parties appeared physically before this Court produced their copies of Aadhar in proof of their identification.

5. Sri P. Rama Bhopal Reddy, Sri S. S. Bhatt, Sri T. Balaji, Sri P. V. Raghuram, and Sri K. Venugopal Reddy, learned counsel for the respective parties, are present before this Court. The parties on both sides are identified by their respective learned counsel.

6. When this Court enquired about the compromise, the parties stated that they had settled the matter amicably by entering into a memorandum of compromise, and the appeals may be disposed of in terms of the said compromise.

7. In view of the same, I.A.No.01 of 2026 in S.A.No.1040 of 2011 is allowed. Consequently, S.A.No.955 of 2011, S.A.No.1040 of 2011, S.A.No.1041 of 2011 and S.A.No.1210 of 2012 are disposed of by recording the memorandum of compromise. There shall be no order as to costs.

8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of in consequence.

9. The Registry is directed to annex a copy of the memorandum of compromise dated 27.11.2025 to this judgment.

_______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 12.02.2026 MH HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO S.A.Nos.1041, 955 & 1210 of 2012 &

I.A.No.1 of 2026 in/and S.A.No.1040 of 2011 Date: 12.02.2026 MH

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top