SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 2421

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
PUNYAMANTHULA LOVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WP 3000/2026



APHC010049272026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3331]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3000/2026 Between:

1. PUNYAMANTHULA LOVARAJU, S/O KAMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO. 4-126, PATA MANJERU STREET, KAJULURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533468.

2. SRI. PUNYAMANTHULA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O SUBBARAYUDU, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, D. NO. 4-160 MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533468.

3. SRI. PUNYAMANTHULA GOVINDA RAJULU, S/O CHANDRARAO, AGED 51 YEARS, OCCCULTIVATION, RIO D. NO. 5-127 MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 533468. 4

4. SRI. GANDI VENKATA RAMANA, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RIO D. NO. 4-1003/1 MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 533468. 5.

5. SRI. GANDI SURYA PRAKASH RAO, S/O APPALARAJU, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RIO D. NO. 4-107 MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 533468. 6.

6. SRI. GANDI VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O KAMARAJU, AGED 49 YEARS, OCCCULTIVATION, RIO D. NO. 5-17, PATHA MANJERU VEEDHI

7. SRI. PUNYAMANTHULA APPANNA,, S/O RAMAKRISHNA, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RIO D. NO. 4-431, MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -533468. 8.

8. SRI. PUNYAMANTHULA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O APPANNA, AGED 72 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION RIO D. NO. 4-112, MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533468. 9.

9. SRI. PUNYAMANTHULA SUBBARAO, S/O APPANNA, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RIO D. NO. 4-119, MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 533468.

10. SRI. GANDI NAGESWARARAO, S/O BAGIRAJU, AGED 65 YEARS, OC CULTIVATION, RIO D. NO. 5-115 MAIN ROAD, MANJERU, KAJULURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -

533468.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, J REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TULLURU, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.

2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BESIDE DISTRICT LIBRARY, MAIN ROAD KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.

4. MANJERU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY,MANJERU VILLAGE, KAJULURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the impugned notices issued by the 4th Respondent, branding the Petitioners as encroachers and directing them to vacate the subject land, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and in blatant violation of the order dated 21-08-2025 passed in W.P. No.22040 of 2025 and consequently set aside the impugned notices and further direct the Respondent authorities to strictly comply with the directions issued by this Honble Court in W.P. No.22040 of 2025 by conducting a proper physical survey and demarcation after due notice to the Petitioners and by passing a reasoned speaking order and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned notices dated: 19-01-2026 issued by the 4th Respondent, whereby the Petitioners are branded as encroachers and directed to vacate the subject land, as the same is ex facie illegal, arbitrary and issued in blatant violation of the order dated 21-08-2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 22040 of 2025 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and further direct the Respondent authorities to strictly maintain status-quo as o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top