HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
AZMEERA KOTI NAIK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 35604/2025
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:5521
APHC010692112025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3331]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 35604/2025
Between:
1. A ZMEERA KOTI NAIK, S/O RAMULU NAIK, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC
AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O D.NO. 5-170, TADIKONDA, THULLUR
MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN-52223.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYATH RAJ AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2
2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, . GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, A.P..
3.
3. T HE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT,
GUNTUR, A.P..
4. T HE ANANTHAVARAM GRAM PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS
PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, TULLURU
MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5.
5. C HITTIPOTHULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VENKAIAH, AGE 54 YEARS,
RIO D.NO.5-105, ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL,
GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6.
6. N ALGONDA SIVA SANKAR, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGE 47 YEARS, R/O
D.NO.5-1444, S.T. COLONY, NEAR VENKATESWARA SWAMY,
ARCH, ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:5521
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction, more particularly one in the
nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, particularly
respondent No.4 in trying to demolishing the Jagadambha Temple situated in
Survey No.39/1 of Ananthavaram Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District vide
Demolition Notice dated 12.11.2025, which was issued basing on the Order
of this Honble Court in WP.No.27658 of 2025 dated 09.10.2025 without
considering the explanation submitted by the, petitioners and without even
verifying the revenue records as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper,
contrary to law, contrary to rules, amounts to non-application of mind,
colourable exercise of power and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of
the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents not to
interfere with the daily rituals/ Poojas performed by the petitioner to their Deity
i.e. Jagadamba Temple and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
suspend the impugned Notice 12.11.2025 issued by the 4th respondent for
demolition of "Jagadamba Temple" situated in Survey No.39/1 of
Ananthavaram Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y KAMALA RANI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI
3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram
Panchayats
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:5521
:: ORDER ::
Heard Ms. Y.Kamala Rani, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri
P.Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj
and Rural Development, appeared for the respondents 1 to 3, Sri M.Sudhir,
learned Standing counsel, appeared for the 4th respondent and Sri Sasanka
Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel, appeared for the respondents 5 and 6.
2. Impugning the notice dated 12.11.2025 (Ex.P1), issued by the 4th
respondent, the above writ petition was filed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners
and others are the residents of Ananthavaram Village, objected to the illegal
occupation by the respondents 5 and 6 in Sy.No.39/2. The Sy.No.39 was
subdivided into 39/1 and 39/2. The petitioners are residing at Sy.No.39/1, and
the temple is also located in the same survey number. The 4th respondent
issued notice dated 12.11.2025 (Ex.P1), under the guise of the order dated
09.10.2025 in W.P.No.27658 of 2025. The petitioners submitted an
explanation dated 25.11.2025 (Ex.P8). However, without considering the
explanation, the 4th respondent is taking steps to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.