HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
MEESALA SURYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
REDDI RAMU – Respondent
TRCMP 407/2025
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:2095
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.407 of 2025
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.V.Satish, learned
counsel for the petitioner has represented that the proof of service memo dated
19.01.2026, along with the postal track consignment sheet is filed before the
Registry and the same is placed on the record. As per the track consignment sheet,
the registered notice sent to the respondent was served on him on 26.12.2025.
Therefore, service held sufficient. None appeared for the respondent.
2. The petitioner/wife filed the present petition under Section 24 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to transfer O.S.No.12 of 2023, on the file of the
Senior Civil Judge, at VIzianagaram to the VII Additional District Judge Court,
Vijayawada, Krishna District, for conducting joint trial.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief is as follows:
I. The petitioner is the resident of Konuru Village, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram
District and was elected as MPTC in his village in the year 2014. Thereafter,
the petitioner stood as a mediator to Mr. Meesala Raja Gopal Naidu, who
purchased lands in their area and subsequently, disputes arose between both
of them as some of the lands purchased by Meesala Raja Gopal Naidu are
found to be D-Form Pattas and thus he demanded recovery of amounts from
the ryots and has taken promissory notes with a date 13.03.2020, and also the
##PAGE2##2 2026:APHC:2095
signature of the petitioner at Konuru Village for a total amount of
Rs.45,00,000/. The petitioner pleaded that he recovered Rs.32,00,000/- and
paid the same to Meesala Raja Gopal Naidu, but, the said Meesala Raja
Gopal Naidu demanded the petitioner for more amount with interest.
II. The petitioner pleaded that the said Meesala Raja Gopal Naidu, with a view to
harass the petitioner, filed nine civil suits in various Courts at various districts
through his close associates. The petitioner further pleaded that the plaintiffs
in all the above civil suits sought for recovery of money on the basis of
promissory note alleged to have been executed by the petitioner on
13.03.2020, and in all the promissory notes in the aforesaid nine (09) civil
suits, the attestors and scribe are common and the scribe and the attestors
have also filed civil suits. The petitioner pleaded that the said civil suits are
filed in different places only to harass him to move around the Courts in
various districts and as the cause of action, the petitioner’s defence, the issue
and the evidence to be lead in all the civil suits is common, the petitioner is
constrained to file the present transfer petition against the respondent seeking
to transfer O.S.No.12 of 2023, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, at
VIzianagaram to the VII Additional District Judge Court, Vijayawada, Krishna
District, for conducting joint trial.
4. Heard Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner. Though registered
notice sent to the respondent was served on him, none appeared for the respondent.
Therefore, service held sufficient. Perused the material available on record.
##PAGE3##5. The contention of the petitioner is that the suit in O.S.No.12 of 2023, on the
file of the Senior Civil Judge, at Vizianagaram and other eight (08) connected suits
are filed in various Courts for recovery of money based on the promissory notes
dated 13.03.2020, at the instance of one Mr. Meesala Raja Gopal Naidu and in all
the said cases, his defence is common and due to that all the suits have to be
dispose of by the same Court to avoid the conflict of decisions. The petitioner herein
approached this Court by filing a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions for seeking
transfer of the other suits to the VII Additional District Judge Court, Vijayawada, at
where the case in O.S.No.29 of 2023 is pending. The said batch of the transfer civil
miscellaneous petitions were allowed by this Court vide its common order dated
01.07.2024.
6. The contention of the petitioner is that all th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.