Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
S PRABHAKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the main issue concerns the non-extension of superannuation benefits to the petitioners. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments about discrimination in extending the benefits under g.o.ms.no.15 were presented. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. court evaluated the policies and existing rules governing superannuation age. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court referenced pivotal case law establishing policy matters regarding retirement age. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. the petitions were ultimately disposed of with specific directions for state consideration. (Para 18 , 19) |
COMMON ORDER:
The common issue in all the writ petitions is not extending the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR&LR) dated 31.01.2022 in respect of the employees of Respondent-Society as illegal, arbitrary.
2. The Petitioners are working in Andhra Pradesh Residential Educational Institutions Society (herein after referred to as ‘APREIS’ for brevity) in teaching faculty. Originally, the age of superannuation of the employees of the Society, other than Class IV employees, was 58 years. While so, the State Government issued A.P.Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Amendment Act, 2014, enhancing the age o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
