HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K SREENIVASA REDDY
JAGARLAMUDI VASANTHA RAO – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE – Respondent
WP 1551/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:3265
APHC010011692026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
[3327]
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.1551 OF 2026
Between:
Jagarlamudi Vasantha Rao ...PETITIONER
AND
Regional Passport Office, Vijayawada, rep. by
the Regional Passport Officer and others ...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BASHEER AHMED
Counsel for the Respondents:
1. GP FOR HOME
2. ALEKHYA TADASINA(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
The Court made the following ORDER:
The present writ petition has been filed questioning the
action of 1st respondent in not considering the petitioner’s
application, vide File No. VJE065878512725 dated 06.11.2025,
and in not issuing a passport to him.
##PAGE2##SRK, J
2 WP No.1551 of 2026 2026:APHC:3265
2. Case of the petitioner is that, he made an online application
before 1st respondent, bearing File No.VJE065878512725, dated
06.11.2025, for issuance of Passport. While so, on 15.12.2025,
1st respondent issued a show cause notice to the petitioner
stating that Police Verification Report indicates that he was
involved in a criminal case registered in Crime No.128 of 2023 of
Addanki Police Station, Bapatla district, for the offences
punishable under Sections 420 and 386 read with 34 IPC.
Petitioner states that 1st respondent is not issuing passport on the
ground of pendency of investigation in the said Crime. Hence, he
filed the present Writ Petition.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home
submitted that the case in Crime No.128 of 2023 of Addanki
Police Station, Bapatla district is at the stage of investigation.
4. The issue and renewal of passports is regulated by the
Passports Act, 1967. Section 6(2), extracted below, is relevant
for this purpose.
(2) subject to the other provisions of this Act,
the passport authority shall refuse to issue a
passport or travel document for visiting any foreign
country under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of
Section 5 on any one or more of the following
grounds, and on no other ground, namely:-
(a) that the applicant is not a citizen of India.,
(b) that the applicant may, or is likely to,
engage outside India in activities prejudicial to the
sovereignty and integrity of India.,
(c) that the departure of the applicant from
India may, or is likely to, be detrimental to the
security of India.,
##PAGE3##SRK, J
3 WP No.1551 of 2026 2026:APHC:3265
(d) that the presence of the applicant outside
India may, or is likely to, prejudice the friendly
relations of India with any foreign country.,
(e) that the applicant has, at any time during
the period of five years immediately preceding the
date of his application, been convicted by a Court
in India for any offence involving moral turpitude
and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment
for not less than two years.,
(f) that proceedings in respect of an offence
alleged to have been committed by the applicant
are pending before a criminal court of India.,
(g) that a warrant or summons for the
appearance, or a warrant for the arrest, of the
applicant has been issued by a Court under any
law for the time being in force or that an order
prohibiting the departure from India of the applicant
has been made by any such court.,
(h) that the applicant has been repatriated
and has not reimbursed the expenditure incurred in
connection with such repatriation.,
(i) that in the opinion of the Central
Government the issue of a passport or travel
document to the applicant will not be in the public
interest.
The grounds on which, the issue of Passport to the
petitioner is being refused could at best fall within the ambit of
Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act,1967. This provision has
been considered in various cases and the ambit of this provision
is fairly settled.
5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its Judgment dated
27.09.2021 in Crl.A.No.1342 of 2017 in the case of Vangala
Kasturi Rangacharyulu vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, after
considering Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.