2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3228
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
PADAGALA RAMANA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 6598/2023
##PAGE1##
RC,J
W.P.No.65982 o0f2 260:A23P HC:12612
1
APHC010131812023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3332]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6598/2023
Between:
1. PADAGALA RAMANA, S/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 37
YEARS, R/O. SANTOSH NAGAR, VT AGRAHARAM, VIZIANAGARAM
TOWN AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., 4TH
AND 5TH FLOOR, H.NO.10-152/1, SRI SAI TOWERS, ASHOK
NAGAR, BESIDE SIRIS COMPANY, KANURU, BANDAR ROAD,
VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM
DISTRICT.
5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
6. THE THASILADAR, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM
DISTRICT.
7. ABOTHULAAPPALAKONDAMMA, W/O. NARAYANARAO, AGED
ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC.
FP SHOP DEALER, FP SHOP NO.94, BC COLONY, VIZIANAGARAM
TOWN AND DISTRICT
##PAGE2##RC,J
W.P.No.65982 o0f2 260:2A3P HC:12612
2
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction
declaring the action of the 5th respondent in restoring the authorization of 7th
respondent vide proceedings Rc.No.1298/2018/A1, .M.28.02.2023 as Fair
price shop dealer, fair price shop No.0281094 of B.C.Colony, VT Agraharam,
Vizianagaram town and mandal, Vizianagaram District as illegal, arbitrary, and
in violation to the Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System
(Control) Order, 2018 and consequently set aside the proceedings
Rc.No.1298/2018/A1, Dt.28.02.2023 issued by the 5th respondent and restore
the authorization of the petitioner and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to suspend the proceedings, Rc.No.1298/2018/A1, Dt.28.02.2023
issued by the 5th respondent in restoring (he authorization of the 7th
respondent to the fair price shop No.0281094 of B.C.Colony, VT Agraharam,
Vizianagaram town and mandal, Vizianagaram District pending disposal of the
writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO
2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP)
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##RC,J
W.P.No.65982 o0f2 260:2A3P HC:12612
3
ORDER
This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings of respondent
no.5 vide Rc.No.1298/2018/ A1, dated 28.02.2023 restoring the authorization
of respondent no.7 as Fair Price Shop dealer of FP shop No.0281094 of
B.C.Colony, VT Agraharam, Vizianagaram Town., being arbitrary and in
violation of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Targeted Public Distribution
System (Control) Order, 2018.
2. Heard Sri K.Devi Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner,
Sri Vineeth Appasani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies
and Sri Bonu Rama Shankar Rao, learned counsel for respondent no.7.
3. Sri K.Devi Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, while
reiterating the contents of the writ petition would submit that consequent to
registration of case under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act against
the permanent FP shop dealer (respondent No.7) the petitioner was
appointed as temporary dealer of the subject shop and eversince the
petitioner had been supplying essential commodities to the cardholders. He
would further submit that respondent no.7 made representations to the
authorities for restoration of her dealership and questioning inaction in
disposing of the representations, respondent no.7 file