HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
D. Chaitanya – Appellant
Versus
The State of A.P. – Respondent
WP 2411/2026
##PAGE1##
::1:: 2026:APHC:6529
APHC010041382026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3208]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 2411/2026
Between:
1. D . CHAITANYA,, S/O. OMKAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC.
DY. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (FAC) ITDA,
RAMPACHODAVARAM, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT,
R/O. GOVT., QUARTERS, NEAR PMRC, RAMPACHODAVARAM
ALLURI SEETHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF A P, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
TRIBAL WELFARE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522502
2. T HE ENGINEERINCHIEF, TRIBAL WELFARE ENGINEERING
DEPT., REVENUE COLONY, LABBI PETA, VIJAYAWADA,
KRISHNA DISTRICT-522001
...RESPONDENT(S):
##PAGE2##::2:: 2026:APHC:6529
This Court made the following ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more
particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the
action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the
Petitioner for promotion to the post of Dy. Executive Engineer,
on the ground of pendency of disciplinary proceedings vide
charge memo in Procgs. No. CB3/167/C. 2483508/Complaint
Inq.Report/2021, dt. 08.11.2024, as illegal, arbitrary,
discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the
Constitution of India and consequently, direct the Respondents
to promote the Petitioner to the post of Dy. Executive Engineer,
without reference to the disciplinary proceedings / charge memo
pending against him, from the date of their eligibility, with all
service and monetary benefits and to pass….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Pleader for the respondents.
3. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Executive Engineer on
18.07.2017. The 2nd Respondent issued a charge memo dated
08.11.2024 alleging procedural irregularities in connection with the
construction of additional infrastructure facilities to the APTW Residential
Junior College for Girls at Busarajupalli Village, Buttaigudem Mandal,
West Godavari District. The petitioner submitted a detailed explanation on
28.11.2024 denying the allegations and requested dropping of further
action, and also made another representation dated 03.10.2025.
However, the disciplinary proceedings are still pending without
##PAGE3##::3:: 2026:APHC:6529
finalization. Meanwhile, a tentative seniority list of Assistant Engineers
and Assistant Executive Engineers for the panel years 2016–17 to 2023–
24 was prepared, wherein the petitioner is placed at Sl. No. 2 in the panel
year 2016–17 of AEE’s of Zone–I. The petitioner, though fully eligible and
falling within the zone of consideration for promotion to the post of Deputy
Executive Engineer, is likely to be excluded from consideration solely on
account of the pendency of disciplinary proceedings, despite the
existence of several vacancies and initiation of the promotion process by
the respondents. Hence the writ petition.
4. As seen from the material available on record, the charge memo
dated 08.11.2024 is pending against the petitioner; however, the inquiry
has not been completed till date.
5. In Rajeswara Reddy’s case, at para No.6, the Division Bench of
Composite High Court observed as follows:
“…..Since the petitioners did not complete the
departmental proceedings against the respondent
even after lapse of more than one and half years,
the Tribunal has rightly directed consideration of the
case of the respondent for promotion without
reference to the pending disciplinary proceedings,
and no interference is called for with the said order.”
6. Ordinarily, an employee is not considered for promotion when
disciplinary proceedings are initiated against him on serious allegations.
##PAGE4##::4:: 2026:APHC:6529
However, an employee cannot be denied promotion by keeping the
disciplinary proceedings pending for unduly long pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.