SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3310

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
V. RATHNMA BABU CHETTY – Appellant
Versus
Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams – Respondent


APHC010737882013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14962/2013 Between:

1. V . RATHNMA BABU CHETTY, S/O V.SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT

51 YEARS, OCC : LIBRARIAN (ON DEPUTATION) SPW JR. COLLEGE, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, R/O 4-97, VOOTLAVARIPALLI VILLAGEPAKALA POST & MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND

1. T IRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICERTIRUMALA HILLS, TIRUPATI

2. T HE PRINCIPAL, SPW JR. COLLEGE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

3. T HE DIRECTOR, SVETATIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 1st respondent in not considering the representations of the petitioner dated 26-11-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top