Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
CH BHASKARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contract terms and payment delays. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. accountability of public officers concerning financial obligations. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. principles of public accountability as set by precedent. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. interest on delayed payments due to government inaction. (Para 17) |
| 5. final ruling on emd repayment. (Para 18) |
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Ms. Aishwarya Nagula, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for MAUD and Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation.
2. Having regard to the facts of the case, at the very outset, this Court is constrained to observe the sorry state of affairs prevailing in the Respondent No.2 - Corporation.
3. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner has executed contractual works, which are described in Para 3 of the Affidavit; and that the said works were initially allotted on 09.03.2011 and were completed by the petitioner strictly following the terms and conditions, without any delay or remark from any quarter.
4. It is stated that the total valuation of the work as per the Agreement is Rs.43,53,019/-, and out of the said amount, Re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
