2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3386
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
G. Pedda Hanumanthu(Died) as per L.R P2 – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 2419/2021
##PAGE1##
1
2026:APHC:7041
APHC010035012021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3332]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Writ Petition Nos: 2419/2021 & 447/2025
W.P.No.2419/2021:
Between:
G. Pedda Hanumanthu(died) As Per L.r P2 and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. C JHANSI RANI
2. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:7041
APHC010008142025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3332]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 447/2025
Between:
Gangy Neelamma ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C JHANSI RANI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following COMMON JUDGMENT:
The W.P.No.2419 of 2021 is filed questioning the proceedings dated
15.01.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent (RDO) vide Rc.M.4437/2019 wherein
the petitioner’s authorization as fair price shop dealer for shop No.1302031
situated in Irangal village, Kosigi mandal, Kurnool district was cancelled.
2. The W.P.No.447 of 2025 is filed questioning the proceedings dated
23.12.2024 issued by 2nd respondent (RDO) vide R.C.(M).1159/2024 wherein
applications are invited to fill up vacancies of various fair price shops including
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:7041
shop No.1302031 situated in Irangal village, Kosigi mandal, Kurnool district
without considering the petitioner’s application dated 29.10.2021 for
appointment on compassionate grounds.
3. The petitioner in both the writ petitions is one and same and since both
the writ petitions are interlinked, they are heard together and are being
disposed of by this common judgment.
4. Heard Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, learned counsel for the petitioner in
both the writ petitions and Sri Vineeth Appasani, learned Assistant
Government Pleader for civil supplies.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner in elaboration to what has been
stated in the affidavit contended that, the respondents have appointed one
G.Pedda Hanumanthu (died) 1st petitioner in W.P.No.2419 of 2021 as
permanent fair price shop dealer and upon the report of tahsildar, a show
cause notice was issued dated 9.08.2019 alleging violation of conditions of the
Control Order, 2018 and without conducting any enquiry, the 2nd respondent
issued suspension proceedings vide Rc.CS3/312/2019 dated .09.2019. He
further submitted that, questioning the said suspension order, the 1st petitioner
filed W.P.No.16163 of 2019 which was disposed by this Hon’ble Court under
its order dated 31.10.2019 by setting aside the suspension proceedings and
further directed the 1st petitioner to submit explanation to the show cause
notice and also directed the respondents to supply the essential commodities
##PAGE4##4
2026:APHC:7041
to petitioner’s fair price shop till completion of the enquiry. He further
submitted that, pursuant to the said order, the 2nd respondent again issued
show cause notice by framing the earlier charges and the 1st petitioner had
also submitted his explanation, however, without conducting any enquiry as
contemplated under control order, 2018, the RDO has issued proceedings
cancelling his authorization to the subject fair price shop vide proceedings
dated 15.01.2021 and the same was restored under proceedings dated
15.03.2021 as per the interim directions of this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.2419
of 2021. He further submitted that, as the 1st petitioner died on 09.09.2021
pending consideration of the writ petition, petitioner in W.P.No.447 of 2025
has come on record as 2nd petitioner in W.P.No.2419 of 2021 being legal heir.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, as the 1st petitioner
died, 2nd petitioner (petitioner in W.P.No.447 of 20