SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4125

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY,HARINATH.N
TALLA SAMRAJYAMMA KRISHNA DIST. – Appellant
Versus
JOINT COLLECTOR KRISHNA DIST. & 18 OTHERS – Respondent
WA 891/2010



APHC010202572010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3569]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT APPEAL No.891 of 2010 Between:

1. T ALLA SAMRAJYAMMA, W/O SWAMYNADHA REDDY, R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT AND

1. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHLIPATNAM.

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

4. SANDIPAM CHINA KOTAIAH, S/O LAZAR (DIED) R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

5. SANDIPAM THIRUPATHI RAO, S/O LAZAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: ARICULTURE, R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

6. SANDIPAM YESOBU, S/O.LAZAR (DIED) R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

7. SANDIPAM POUL, S/O.SANDIPAM CHINA KOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

8. SANDIPAM VEERAIAH, S/O.LATE PATHERU, AGED ABOUT

33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

9. SANDIPAM SUKUNDA RAO, S/O.YESEBU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

10. S ANDIPAM JARJE, S/O.YESEBUM AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

11. S ANDIPAM KOTAIAH, S/O.YESEBU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

12. S ANDIPAM BHASKAR RAO, S/O.YESEBU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

13. S ANDIPAM CHINA MOSA, S/O.JOHN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

14. S ANDIPAM YELIA, S/O.JOHN AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

15. S ANDIPAM JAKKARAIAH, S/O.JOHN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

16. S ANDIPAM DAVEED, S/O.JOHN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

17. S ANDIPAM YAKOBU, S/O.LATE SUDHARSHAN, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

18. S ANDIPAM MOSHE, S/O.LATE SUDHARSHAN, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

19. S ANDIPAM SIKHAMANI, S/O.LATE SUDHARSHAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. DEVALARAJU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. A. RADHAKRISHNA 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:

THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. N WRIT APPEAL No.891 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

The appellant herein is the unsuccessful writ petitioner in W.P.No.8799 of 2000. She has filed the said writ petition challenging the order dated 31.03.2000 of the 1st respondent therein, whereby the revision petition filed by her under Section 4A of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 was dismissed, confirming the order dated 23.08.1997 passed by the 2nd respondent therein, who, in turn, confirmed the order dated 24.08.1987 passed by the 3rd respondent, directing resumption of the land in question from the writ petitioner to the State Government.

2. The said writ petition was dismissed by the learned single Judge by order dated 24.09.2010. Aggrieved thereby, the writ petitioner has preferred the present writ appeal.

3. Heard Mr. Devalaraju Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents 1 to 3 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top