SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4365

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K Suresh Reddy, A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, JJ
SRI. BAPIREDDY CHENNA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 2407/2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A SWARUPA REDDY
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

Circumstantial evidence must establish a conclusive chain pointing to the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

Headnote:Section 302 IPC and Section 379 IPC: The appellant, convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and Section 379 IPC for theft, contends the evidence is circumstantial and seeks conviction under milder Section 304 IPC instead. The Court found overwhelming evidence proving guilt, including eyewitness and circumstantial evidence, and emphasized the need for a conclusive chain of circumstances leading to the appellant's guilt.

Result: The appeal is dismissed, confirming the conviction and sentence.

Table of Content
1. the appellant was convicted for murder and theft. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. the appellant challenged the conviction on grounds of lack of direct evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. the court upheld the conviction based on established evidence. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Justice K. Suresh Reddy)

Sole accused in Sessions Case No.126 of 2014 on the file of the XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet, dated 22.03.2018 is the appellant. He was tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet under the following charges:

(i) First charge was under Section 302 IPC

(ii) Second charge was under Section 379 IPC

2. Substance of the charge is that on the night of 07.01.2012, at about 9.00 a.m., the accused went to the house of his brother on his motor cycle bearing No.AP 7 BC 3560, situated at Vidya Towers, Bank street, Narasaraopet, entered into Flat No.302 and asked his sister-in-law, by name Bapireddy Padma (hereinafter referred to as ‘the deceased’) to arrange an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and when she refused the accused attacked her with a knife – MO.24 causing her death. In the same process, he committed theft of jewellery, cash etc.(M.Os. 1 to 13), worth about Rs.10,00,000/- from the iron safe, thereby committed offences punishable under Sections 302 and 379 IPC .

3. After completion of trial, the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the accused/appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to suffer Imprisonment for “LIFE” and also to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three (3) months. The learned Additional Sessions Judge further convicted the accused/appellant under Section 379 and sentenced him to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for a period (3) years. Both the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.

4. Case of the prosecution, briefly, is as follows:

(i) The accused as well as the material prosecution witnesses are residents of Narasaraopet town. The deceased was also resident of same town. PW.1 is none other than the elder brother of the accused. The deceased is the wife of PW.1, who is carrying on jewellery business under the name and style of Siva Sai Jewelers, situated at Sivunibomma center, Narasaraopet. PW.1 along with the deceased was staying in Flat No.302, Vidya towers, Arundalpet, Narasaraopet and they were blessed with two sons, who are prosecuting their studies at Vijayawada.

(ii) PW.2 is none other than the brother of the deceased. The accused having addicted to bad vices, indulged in gambling and he was involved in a case in Cr.No.196 of 2011 under Section 3 and 4 of A.P. Gaming Act, Narasaraopet, I Town Police Station.

(iii) In the month of May 2011, the accused married- LW.7/Divya. Even after his marriage, the accused did not change his attitude and he decided to take the financial assistance of his brother PW.1, as he was well settled in business.

(iv) While so, on 07.01.2012 at about 9.00a.m., in the absence of PW.1, the accused went to the flat of his brother- PW.1 on his motor bike, bearing No.AP 7 BC 3560. He demanded the deceased to arrange an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- as a loan for the purpose of business, for which the deceased refused. In that connection there was an argument between the accused and the deceased. It is said that the deceased went inside the kitchen and brought a knife, there after there was a scuffle between both of them. The accused forcibly pulled the knife from the hands of the deceased and stabbed her indiscriminately, who died instantaneously.

(v) In the same process, accused also received an injury on his left hand. After killing the deceased, the accused took away the entire gold jewellery and cash worth Rs.10,00,000/- from the almarah and other places. He washed blood stained cloths and changed his dress by wearing a lungi and T- shirt belonging to PW.1.

(vi) The accused kept some gold jewellery in his house, and took away gold jewellery marked as M.Os.11 to 13

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top