Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, Tuhin Kumar Gedela, JJ
A . SRIRANGAM DORA, G . RAMESH BABU, T . NAGESWARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to seniority affecting promotees. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claim to seniority by promotees discussed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. understanding of policy rules regarding promotions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final verdict dismissing petition. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Tuhin Kumar Gedela)
Heard,
Sri Srinivasa Rao Mortha, learned counsel representing Sri K. Ram Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing for the State.
1. Dissatisfied and embittered by the order of A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) in O.A.No.2540 of 2017, dated 01.09.2017, the present writ petition is preferred by the applicants in the O.A. under challenge.
2. The case of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that they moved the Tribunal challenging the impugned Memo No.310986/Ex.I(I)/2016, dated 03.02.2017, issued by the 1st respondent and the Consequential Memo in C.R.No.4606/2016/CPC/C1, dated 08.02.2017, of the 2nd respondent. The facts are not disputed by either side that the petitioners are the promotees, and the unofficial respondents, who got impleaded through I.A.No.1 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
