SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4621

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
GUBBALA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY E.G. DIST. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER KAKINADA MUN. CORP. E.G. DIST. & ANR – Respondent
WP 11254/2013



APHC010716102013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11254/2013 Between:

1. G UBBALA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, E.G. DIST., S/O LATE NARAYANA MURTHY,53 YEARS, D.NO.70-19-

96,GODARIGUNTA,KAKINADA - 3.EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

2. M UMMANA SURYA RAO, S/O LATE GURUVULU, AGED 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1-93-10, SECTOR 5, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM -530 017. PETITIONER NO.2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.24.11.2025 IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2025 ...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. C OMMISSIONER KAKINADA MUN CORP E G DIST ANR, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER,KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST.

2. B UILDING INSPECTOR, IIIRD DIVISION,KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST.

3. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT , PADMINI ENCLAVE, 5TH LANE, 4/7, MAHATMA GANDHI INNER RING ROAD, ANNAPURNA NAGAR, GUNTUR , ANDHRA PRADESH- 522034. R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT 25.02.2022 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO 01 OF 2021.

4. J AYENDRA NAGAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, (REGD NO.491/2015) AT D.NO 70-14-14/1 JAYENDRA NAGAR, KAKINADA- 533003 E.G DISTRICT REP BY ITS PRESIDENT. R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURTS ORDER DT 04.09.2023 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO 01 OF 2015.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the action of the respondents in trying to construct a compound wall over an extent of 700 sq. yards of land belonging to the petitioner situated in Sy.No.127/4 (old 127), Ward No.30, Block No.70 of Ramanaiahpeta, Kakinada Urban Mandal, East Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to make any construction whatsoever over an extent of 700 sq. yards of land belonging to the petitioner situated in Sy.No.127/4 (old 127), Ward No.30, Block No.70 of Ramanaiahpeta, Kakinada Urban Mandal, East Godavari District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 13934 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to make any construction whatsoever over an extent of 700 sq. yards of land belonging to the petitioner situated in Sy.No.127/4 (old 127), Ward No.30, Block No.70 of Ramanaiahpeta, Kakinada Urban Mandal, East Godavari District pending disposal of the writ petition.

IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 163948 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 55603 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the Petitioner as Party Respondent No.3 in the present Writ Petition i.e., W.P.M.P.No.13934 of 2013 in W.P.No.11254 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed respondent No,3 herein as respondent no.3 in Writ Petition No.11253 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the petitioner herein i.e. Mummana Surya Rao to come on record as Writ Petitioner No.2 in W.P.No.11254 of 2013 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. N SIVA REDDY

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top