Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V. Sujatha, J
GUNDLA GOVINDA RAJULU, GUNDLA KODANDAPANI – Appellant
Versus
PEDDISETTY SRINIVASA KUMAR, PEDDISETTY GOVINDA RAJA PANKAJ MALLICK, PEDDISETTY SWAROOPA RANI, PEDDISETTY BANSALI BABU, PEDDISETTY VISHNUPRIYA RANI, PEDDISETTY GOVINDA RAJA RAM PANKAJ MALLICK, MANCHALA DEVIKA RANI, GADAMSETTY RATHNAIAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute exists over legal amendments post-trial initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments highlight legality versus the practicality of property claims. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. limitation concerns impact the foundation of amendment applications. (Para 18 , 27) |
| 4. court commits to judicial prudence regarding claims. (Para 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. final orders reflect the absence of significant errors from the lower court. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
COMMON ORDER
Civil Revision Petition No.1358 of 2023 is filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 10.03.2023 passed in I.A.No.373 of 2022 in O.S.No.227 of 2014 by the VII Additional District Judge, Gudur, whereby, the Trial Court dismissed the said interlocutory application filed Under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short ―C.P.C.‖) to permit the petitioners/plaintiffs to amend the plaint.
2) Civil Revision Petition No.1357 of 2023 is filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 10.03.2023 passed in I.A.No.372 of 2022 in O.S.No.264 of 2014 by the VII Additional District Judge, Gudur, whereby, the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
