Date on which Judgment was : 20.12.2025 reserved Date on which Judgment was : 08.01.2026 pronounced Date on which Judgment was : 08.01.2026 uploaded on the website of the High Court APHC010296312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3327]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1593/2025 Between:

1. MADDIRALA CHINNAPAPAGARI CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, S/O M.C. BAYA REDDY, AGED 61 YEARS, 2. MADDIRALA CHINNAPAPAGARI BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O M.C. BAYA REDDY, AGED 56 YEARS, 3. MADDIRALA CHINNAPAPAGARI CHINNAPPA REDDY,, S/O M.C. BAYA REDDY, AGED 49 YEARS. ALL ARE HINDUS, CULTIVATORS, RESIDENTS OF BAYYAREDDI GARI PALLI, H/O KORLAGUNTA, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

A N D

1. MADDIRALA CHINNAPAPAGARI NAGI REDDYDECEASED, REPRESENTED BY L.RS.

RESPONDENTS 3 TO 6.

2. PERAM NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O VEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, HINDU, MPTC MEMBER, RESIDENT OF CHAVITI PALLI, H/O. KORLAGUNTA, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

3. M C NAGAMMA, W/O. M.C. NAGI REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS. CULTIVATOR, RESIDENT OF BAYYAREDDI GARI PALLI H/O. KORLAGUNTA, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

4. MANCHINTI RAJESWARI, W/O. LATE RAGHUNATHA REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF EPILAVANKA PALLI, H/O. GORLAMUDIVEEDU, RAYACHOTY MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

5. BONASI JAYAMMA, W/O. GOPAL REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS. CULTIVATOR, RESIDENT OF EPILAVANKA PALLI, H/O. GORLAMUDIVEEDU, RAYACHOTY MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

6. S ESWARAMMA, W/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED 38 YEARS.

CULTIVATOR, RESIDENT OF VANAMLO PALLI, CHILEKAM PALLI CHAKRAYAPETA MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT.

7. PERAM THANUJ YASWANTH REDDY, S/O PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED 25 YEARS. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF RACHA PALLI, H/O. KORLAKUNTA, GALIVEEDU MANDAL ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the Order, dated 06.03.2025, passed in I.A. No. 72 of 2025 in O.S. No. 3 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the V Additional District Judge, Rayachoty, YSR District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 3 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the V Additional District Judge, Rayachoty, YSR District, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K

2.

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1593 OF 2025

O R D E R:

The petitioners/plaintiffs filed the present Revision Petition, challenging the Order dated 06.03.2025 passed in I.A.No.72 of 2025 in O.S.No.3 of 2018 by the learned V Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Rayachoty (hereinafter referred to, as ‘the Trial Court’), whereby and whereunder, petition under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity ‘CPC’) filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs to add the proposed party as defendant No.7, was dismissed.

2. Revision Petitioners are the plaintiffs, and respondent Nos.1 to 6 are the defendant Nos.1 to 6, in O.S.No.3 of 2018 and respondent No.7 is the proposed party. Parties in the present Revision Petition are hereinafter referred to, as they were arrayed in the suit.

3. Plaintiffs filed suit in O.S.No.3 of 2018 on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Rayachoty against the defendant Nos.1 to 6 for the reliefs of (i) declaration, to declare the right and title of the plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property, consequentially to restrain the defendants and their men and associates form interfering with the peaceful poss