Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Challa Gunarajan, J
S.B.G. Sarma, E.G. District – Appellant
Versus
Bank Of Baroda Mumbai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner contested charge memo's legitimacy. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments focused on jurisdiction and application of regulations. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. court examined past disciplinary actions and context. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court ruled on jurisdictional limits of disciplinary proceedings. (Para 18 , 22 , 24) |
| 5. final conclusion to quash charge memo and penalties. (Para 26) |
ORDER:
Writ petitioner initially assailed the charge memo vide Lr.No.BCC/HRM/IL/95/DA190/7021, dated 26.08.2003/ 02.09.2003, issued by 2nd respondent purportedly in exercise of powers under Regulation 45 & 48 of Bank of Baroda Officer Employees’ Pension Regulations, 1995 (hereinafter, referred to as ‘Pension Regulations’) r/w Sub-Regulation 6(3) of Bank of Baroda Officer Employees’ (Discipline & Appeal Regulations), 1976 (hereinafter, referred to as ‘DA Regulations’) to be arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction.
2. Subsequent to filing of writ petition, as the 2nd respondent has passed order dated 21.04.2006 imposing penalty of withdrawing 1/3rd of pension permanently as a measure of punishment, petitioner sought for amendment of prayer by laying challenge to the said order. This Court, by or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
