Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, J
Tella Bhaskara Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employee entitled to terminal benefits upon superannuation. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. non-payment justifications presented by respondents. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's findings on legal liabilities regarding gratuity. (Para 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. entitlement to statutory benefits and interest on delays. (Para 17 , 18 , 26) |
| 5. writ petition allowed with directives for payment. (Para 30) |
ORDER
The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following main relief:
“to declare the action of the respondents though the petitioner is entitled for arrears of salary of Rs.2,28,260/- and gratuity, encashment of earned leave not releasing retiral benefits to the petitioner till date without any valid reasons prolonging the issue with a malafide intention as illegal, arbitrary and void and consequently direct the respondents to release the arrears of salary and terminal benefits with interest and to pass…..”
2. Heard Smt.Akella Padma, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3. Ms.Umadevi, learned Standing Counsel appeared for respondents 4 and 5. Perused the material on re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
