HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NINALA JAYASURYA
Shaik Babu Saheb – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WP 5505/2019
##PAGE1##
1
2025:APHC:696130
APHC010124842019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3209]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No: 5505 of 2019
Between:
1. SHAIK BABU SAHEB, S/o. SHAIK BASHA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 43
YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/o.DOOR No.1/648,
VEERAMUSTIPALYAM, JAYARAMARAO STREET, SRIKALAHASTI
TOWN, CHITTOOR DIST.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPT, (ASSIGNMENTS WING) SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ( ASSIGNMENTS WING), CHITTOOR
DIST., CHITTOOR.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
4. THE THASILDAR, THOTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Mr.T.C. KRISHNAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
##PAGE2##2
2025:APHC:696130
The Court made the following Order:
The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by an order dated 02.04.2007
passed by the 4th respondent in resuming the subject matter land of an extent
of Ac.2.00 cents situated in Survey No.285/2 P of Thottambedu Village.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the said
extent of land was assigned to the petitioner’s father vide DKT Patta
No.195/4/92 dated 31.08.1982 and during the life time of the petitioner’s
father, the revenue officials granted a Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed. He
submits that after the death of the petitioner’s father, being the successor of
the subject matter property / land, the petitioner carried on cultivation by
raising dry crops. He submits that while that being the position, the 4th
respondent and other officials started interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful
possession and enjoyment of the subject matter land and on enquiry, it was
informed that the DKT patta granted to the petitioner’s father was cancelled
long back and therefore, the petitioner can no longer be permitted to continue
the cultivation in the subject matter land. Under the said circumstances, he
submits that the petitioner made further enquiries and after constant
persuasion, the 4th respondent furnished a copy of the Proceedings dated
02.04.2007 impugned in the present writ petition. He submits that the
Proceedings dated 02.04.2007 were passed without issuing any notice, much
less due opportunity to the petitioner and as such the same is liable to be set
aside on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice.
##PAGE3##3
3. The learned counsel further contends that in fact, the said proceedings
were issued after the death of the petitioner’s father on 26.01.2001 and the
same are passed against a dead person are non-est in the eye of Law. He
further submits that the stand taken by the respondent No.4 in the counter-
affidavit to the effect that notices sent to the Village Revenue Officer,
Thottambedu could not be served as the assignees are not residing in the
village and therefore, the notice was served by substitute method of fixing the
same on a stick and planted in the land in question, is not tenable. If the
original assignee i.e., the father of the petitioner died in 2001, the question of
serving of a notice, much less attempt to serve the same on him as sought to
be explained in the counter-affidavit does not arise at all. Be that as it may. He
submits that in similar circumstances, a learned Judge of this Court, set aside
the very same proceedings dated 02.04.2007 in respect of the lands which are
situated in Survey No.285/3 vide Orders 21.11.2022 in W.P.No.16133 of
2015. Making the said submissions, the learned counsel while placing
reliance on the decision of a learned Single Judge of the erstwhile High Court
of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Dodda Narasimhaiah v. District
Collector and Ors.,, 2025:APHC:696130 urges to allow the writ petition.
4. On the other hand, Mr.Dilip Naik, learned Assistant Government
Pleader made submissions with reference to the averments m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.