2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16705
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
SIGILIPALLI SUDHAKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 36380/2025
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:59172
APHC010703662025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3208]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 36380/2025
Between:
1. S IGILIPALLI SUDHAKAR, S/O. NARASIMHULU AGED ABOUT 36
YEARS,R/O. 3-116, MALUGURU, HINDUPUR, SREE SATHYA SAI -
515212.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH.522238
2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SREE SATYA SAI DISTRICT 515134
3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, HINDUPUR MANDAL, SREE
SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.515201
4. T HE TAHSILDAR, HINDUPUR MANDAL.515201
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue Writ Order or direction more particularly one in a nature of
Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.4 in not
mutating the name of the petitioner in the revenue records with respect to the
land in Sy. No. 14-1 to an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Maluguru village,
Hindupur mandal, sree sathya sai district as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional
and consequently direct respondent no.4 to mutate the name of the petitioner
##PAGE2##2
2025:APHC:59172
in an extent of Sy. No. 14-1 to an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Maluguru village,
Hindupur mandal, sree sathya sai district and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to direct respondent no.4 to consider and dispose of the PGRS
application vide MUT251031033300 dated 03-11-2025 pending disposal of
the above writ petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
##PAGE3##3
2025:APHC:59172
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.36380 OF 2025
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in a
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the
respondent no.4 in not mutating the name of the petitioner in
the revenue records with respect to the land in Sy.No.14-1 to
an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Maluguru village, Hindupur
Mandal, Sree Sathya Sai District, as illegal, arbitrary,
unconstitutional and consequently direct respondent no.4 to
mutate the name of the petitioner in an extent of Sy.No.14-1 to
an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Maluguru Village, Hindupur
Mandal, Sree Sathya Sai District and to pass such other order
or orders…”
2. The short grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute
owner of the land admeasuring Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.14-1 at Maluguru
Village, Hindupur Mandal, Sree Sathya Sai District. The petitioner acquired
the said land through registered sale deed vide Registration No.6564/2016.
Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an application vide MUT251031033300
dated 03.11.2025 requesting mutation of petitioner’s name in the revenue
records. However, the respondents have not considered the said application.
Hence, present writ petition has been filed.
3. Heard M/s.Pillix Law Firm, learned counsel for petitioner and learned
Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents.
##PAGE4##4
2025:APHC:59172
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has submitted
Form-6A application. Despite the same, the respondents have not mutated the
name of the petitioner.
5. In reply to the said contention, learned Assistant Government Pleader,
on instructions, submits that respondent authorities have rejected the
application on the ground that the petitioner had purchased the assigned land
in contravention of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of
Transfers) Act, 1977 and that an endorsement to that effect has already been
issu