SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16808

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K MANMADHA RAO
SMT. RACHAKONDA RATTAMMA GUNTUR DISTRICT & 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS HYD & 2 OTHERS – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:-

Heard Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel appearing for Sri G. Venkat Sailendra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing for respondent Nos.1 & 2; Sri V. Venugopal Rao, Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No.4.

2. The instant Writ Petition is filed challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the petitioner's claim for grant of lease of the subject property.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the case are:

The subject temple owns an extent of 8.45 acres of land at Sy.No.271/C-1A and 271/A-1A, Mangalagiri Town. Out of which an extent of Ac-1.88 acres was acquired by the Railways for the railway track. The remaining extent of land was cultivated by the petitioner's father during his lifetime. He died in 1986. During his lifetime, the temple authorities initiated proceedings against the petitioner’s father for eviction and filed a case in A.T.C.No.171 of 1981 on the file of the Court of the Special Officer, Mangalagiri, under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act. The Court of Special Officer passed an order on 15-03-1993, dismissing the temple's ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top