##PAGE1##

1

2025:APHC:59163

APHC010702242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

[3208]

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 36167/2025

Between:

1. S IDDADAPUN PADMA, W/O MURAHARIRAO, AGE 48

YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-237, RAMALAYAM STREET,

MADUGULA VILLAGE, GURAZALA MANDAL PALNADU

DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR- 522238.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT-

522601.

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA

DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT-522415.

4. T HETAHSILDAR, GURAZALA MANDAL, PALNADU

DISTRICT- 522415.

5. T HE MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, GURAZALA

MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT-522402.

##PAGE2##

2

2025:APHC:59163

6. T HE VILLAGE REVENUE INSPECTOR, GOTTIMUKKALA

VILLAGE, GURAZALA MANDAL PALANADU DISTRICT-

522402.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. ARUN SHOWRI G

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following:

##PAGE3##

3

2025:APHC:59163

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION No.36167 of 2025

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the orders passed by the 4^th respondent

dated 27.11.2025, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the

respondents.

3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

that the 4^th respondent issued a notice on 16.10.2025 without

mentioning any provision of law. Though the petitioner submitted

her explanation, the same was not considered, and the impugned

orders were passed cancelling the pattas that were standing in

favour of the petitioner under Section 5(2) of the Andhra Pradesh

Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (as amended

by Act No.8 of 2025) (for short ‘the Act’).

4. A perusal of the impugned orders clearly discloses that the

4^th respondent has passed the orders under Section 5(2) of the

Act. If the petitioner has any grievance, the only remedy

##PAGE4##

4

2025:APHC:59163

available is to file a revision under Section 9 of the Act before the

appropriate authority.

5. Considering the said submissions, the Writ Petition is

disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a revision

under the provisions of the Act within a period of one (01) month.

If such revision is filed, the authorities may consider the same by

following due procedure under law. The petitioner is also granted

liberty to file an interlocutory application along with the revision

and the same may be considered as expeditiously as possible

pending disposal of the revision. Till disposal of the interlocutory

application, the respondents are directed not to take any further

action pursuant to the impugned orders.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be

no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

_______________________

JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date: 30.12.2025

Ivd

##PAGE5##

5

2025:APHC:59163

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION No.36167 of 2025

Dated: 30.12.2025

Ivd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document