##PAGE1##

2025:APHC:61413

APHC010145292025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3208]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 7780/2025

Between:

1. S MADAR VALI, S/O. MAHABOOB SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,

OCC RETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O.H.NO.51-980-A8-2, NEAR MARKET

YARD, INDIRA GANDHI NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY 8I DISTRICT, A.P.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MAHANANDI MANDAL,

NANDYAL DISTRICT.

4. T HE TAHSILDAR, MAHANANDI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.

5. B HASYAM RAMACHANDRAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGE AND

OCCUPATION NOT KNOWN, R/O. THAMMADAPALLI VILLAGE,

MAHANANDI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, A.P.

6. B HASYAM DEVAMMA, W/O. LATE PULLAIAH, AGE AND

OCCUPATION NOT KNOWN, R/O.THAMMADAPALLI VILLAGE,

MAHANANDI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, A.P.

7. B HASYAM RAMA CHANDRUDU, S/O. PEDDA MADDILETY, AGE

AND OCCUPATION NOT KNOWN, R/O. THAMMADAPALLI VILLAGE,

MAHANANDI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, A.P.

2025:APHC:61413

8. B HASYAM CHINNA MADDILETY, S/O. PEDDA MADDILETY, AGE

AND OCCUPATION NOT KNOWN, R/O. THAMMADAPALLI VILLAGE,

MAHANANDI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, A.P

...RESPONDENT(S):

2025:APHC:61413

The Court made the following ORDER:

1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

seeking the following relief:

“to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in

the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the

respondents more particularly the 4 Respondent in not mutating

petitioners name in the revenue records pertaining to land to an

extent of Ac.2.38 cents in Sy.No.267/2 situated at

Thammadapalle Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Nandyal District,

A.P. which is petitioner's ancestral property is being illegal,

arbitrary, unconstitutional, in violation of principles of natural

justice, in violation of provisions of Pattadar Passbooks Act and

in violation of Article 14, 21 300-A of Constitution of India, 1950

and consequentially direct the Respondents particularly the 4^th

Respondent to mutate the name of the petitioner in revenue

records pertaining to the land to an extent of Ac.2.38 cents in

Sy.No.267/2 situated at Thammadapalle Village, Mahanandi

Mandal, Nandyal District, A.P, by deleting the mutations made

in favour of the unofficial respondents thereby considering the

representation made before the 4TH Respondent on 13.11.2024

which was endorsed on 23.11.2024 and pass…”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made

an application/representation dated 13.11.2024 seeking mutation of his name

in the revenue records. However, despite repeated requests, the respondent

authorities have neither considered the said application nor conducted any

enquiry. Hence, the present writ petition.

2025:APHC:61413

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.5 and 6

submits that the unofficial respondents had filed a civil suit against the

petitioner and that the said suit was decreed. Aggrieved by the said judgment

and decree, the petitioner preferred an appeal, which was allowed by setting

aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court, thereby confirming the

petitioner’s rights.

5. Be that as it may, it is not in dispute that the application submitted by

the petitioner is still pending consideration before the respondent authorities.

In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the

dispute.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent

authorities, more particularly the 4^th respondent, to consider the

application/representation submitted by the petitioner dated 13.11.2024,

conduct a detailed enquiry after issuing not