2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17041
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
H P MAHABOOB SHAB – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 36218/2025
##PAGE1##
-1-
W.P. No.36218 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61546
Date of order:29.12.2025
APHC010706202025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3208]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 36218/2025
Between:
1. H P MAHABOOB SHAB, S/O PINJARI HUSSAIN PEER SHAB AGED
ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC EX. SARPANCH, R/O D.NO.1-49. B.C.
COLONY. HANAVALU VILLAGE AND POST, PEDDA TUMBALAM
MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS, SPECIAL CHIEF
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (LANDS IV)
DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI- 522238
2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA
PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL -
518002
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
##PAGE2##-2-
W.P. No.36218 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61546
Date of order:29.12.2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
stay all further proceeding in furtherance of 1st Respondents Government
Order Rt. No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV) Department dated 27/11/2025 and
be pleased to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DHANUNJAYA BARU
Counsel for the RespondentS:
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##-3-
W.P. No.36218 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61546
Date of order:29.12.2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.36218 OF 2025
ORDER
1. The writ petition is filed declaring the G.O.Rt.No.1503 Revenue
(Lands.IV) Department, dt.27.11.2025 is contrary to the Rules more
specifically Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh District (Formation) Rules
1984 [for short „the Rules, 1984’].
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant
Public Prosecutor for Revenue appearing for respondents.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in
fact, in the impugned G.O., the Government has already decided for
bifurcation of Adoni Mandal into two Mandals, Adoni Revenue Division,
Kurnool District, for better administration of the areas concerned. The
said action is contrary to Rule 3 of the Rules 1984. For better
appreciation, Rule 3 is as follows:
“(3) In matters concerning sub-section (1) or sub-section (2)
of Section 3 of the Acts the Collector concerned shall
forward to the Government his report with his views
together with the record of enquiry if any for the
consideration of the Government. If after such
consideration the Government so decides, a preliminary
notification under sub-section(5) of Section 3 of the Act
inviting objections or suggestions to the proposals from
the persons residing in the area/ areas which are likely
to be affected thereby, shall be issued.”
##PAGE4##-4-
W.P. No.36218 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61546
Date of order:29.12.2025
4. On a perusal of the above Rule, it contemplates a report from the
District Collector and consequent on receipt of the report from the
District Collector, the Government so desires and decides for
bifurcation, a preliminary notification under sub-Section (5) of Section 3
of the Act, inviting objections or suggestions to the proposals from the
persons residing in the area/ areas which are likely to be affected
thereby, would be issued. But, in the instant case, on a perusal of the
G.O.Rt.No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV) Department, dt.27.11.2025, the
Government has not referred any report of the District Collector.
5. Replying to the said contentions, the learned Government Pleader for
Revenue appearing for the Respondents has submitted that the
impugned G.O., is only a preliminary notification as per the Rules, 1984.
Rule 4 specifically provides publication of preliminary notification inviting
objections/ suggestions. Even in the instant case, the Gove