HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Yarlagadda Raju – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRLP 13074/2025
##PAGE1##
1
2025:APHC:696029
APHC010679412025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3521]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13074/2025
Between:
Yarlagadda Raju ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. K.V.S.S.PRABHAKARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) by the
Petitioner/Accused for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime
No.101 of 2025 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Kothapeta Dr Ambedkar
Konaseema District, registered for the alleged offence punishable under
Section 7-B read with 8-A and B of the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995
(for brevity ‘the APP Act’).
##PAGE2##2
2025:APHC:696029
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant
Public Prosecutor.
3. As seen from the record, the Prohibition and Excise officials of
Kothapeta drafted a special report alleging that the petitioner was
manufacturing 40 litres of I.D. liquor and 1,300 litres of F.J. wash. The
petitioner was neither found at the spot nor arrested at the time of the alleged
incident. The Excise officials, upon making inquiries with the neighbours,
came to know that the petitioner was allegedly indulging in the said activity.
However, no similar criminal adverse antecedents are reported against the
petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, for statistical
purposes and due to political influence, a false case has been foisted against
the petitioner. The petitioner is a coolie and a permanent resident of
Peravaram Village, Atreyapuram Mandal, Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema
District.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity and nature
of the allegations levelled against the Petitioner/Accused, this Court is inclined
to grant pre-arrest bail to the Petitioner/Accused.
6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following
conditions:
i. In the event of arrest of the Petitioner/Accused, he shall be
enlarged on bail subject to his executing a self-bond for a
sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two
sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the
arresting police officials.
ii. The Petitioner/Accused shall make himself available for
investigation as and when required.
##PAGE3##3
2025:APHC:696029
iii. The Petitioner/Accused shall not cause any threat,
inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses.
iv. The Petitioner/Accused shall appear before the Station
House Officer concerned once in a week i.e., on every
Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., till filing of the
charge sheet.
The Petitioner/Accused shall not leave the State of Andhra
v.
Pradesh limits without the express permission from the
Station House Officer concerned.
vi. The Petitioner/Accused shall surrender his passports, if any,
to the investigating officer. If he claims that he does not have
passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that effect to the
Investigating Officer.
________________________
Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.
Date:29.12.2025
KMS
##PAGE4##4
2025:APHC:696029
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13074 of 2025
Date: 29.12.2025
KMS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.