SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17096

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
MALA DHANALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 36240/2025



##PAGE1##

2025:APHC:61282

APHC010706252025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3208]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 36240/2025

Between:

1. M ALA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O BHEEMESH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

OCC. SARPANCH, R/O S.C. COLONY, SANTHEKUDLUR VILLAGE,

ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS. SPECIAL CHIEF

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (LANDS IV)

DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI- 522238

2. T HE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA

PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503

3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL -

518002

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased topleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more

particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare 1st Respondents

Government Crder Rt. No.1503, dated 27/11/2025 as illegal, arbitrary, pre-

determined and unconstitutional and consequently set-aside the 1st

Respondents Government Order Rt. No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV)

Department dated 27/11/2025 and be pleased to pass

##PAGE2##

-2-

W.P. No.36240 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61282

Date of order:29.12.2025

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

pleased to stay all further proceeding in furtherance of 1st Respondents

Government Order Rt. No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV) Department dated

27/11/2025 and be pleased to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. DHANUNJAYA BARU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following:

##PAGE3##

-3-

W.P. No.36240 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61282

Date of order:29.12.2025

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH

WRIT PETITION No.36240 OF 2025

ORDER

1. The writ petition is filed declaring the G.O.Rt.No.1503 Revenue

(Lands.IV) Department, dt.27.11.2025 is contrary to the Rules more

specifically Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh District (Formation) Rules

1984 [for short „the Rules, 1984’].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant

Public Prosecutor for Revenue appearing for respondents.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in

fact, in the impugned G.O., the Government has already decided for

bifurcation of Adoni Mandal into two Mandals, Adoni Revenue Division,

Kurnool District, for better administration of the areas concerned. The

said action is contrary to Rule 3 of the Rules 1984. For better

appreciation, Rule 3 is as follows:

“(3) In matters concerning sub-section (1) or sub-section (2)

of Section 3 of the Acts the Collector concerned shall

forward to the Government his report with his views

together with the record of enquiry if any for the

consideration of the Government. If after such

consideration the Government so decides, a preliminary

notification under sub-section(5) of Section 3 of the Act

inviting objections or suggestions to the proposals from

the persons residing in the area/ areas which are likely

to be affected thereby, shall be issued.”

##PAGE4##

-4-

W.P. No.36240 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61282

Date of order:29.12.2025

4. On a perusal of the above Rule, it contemplates a report from the

District Collector and consequent on receipt of the report from the

District Collector, the Government so desires and decides for

bifurcation, a preliminary notification under sub-Section (5) of Section 3

of the Act, inviting objections or suggestions to the proposals from the

persons residing in the area/ areas which are likely to be affected

thereby, would be issued. But, in the instant case, on a perusal of the

G.O.Rt.No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV) Department, dt.27.11.2025, the

Government has not referred any report of the District Collector.

5. Replying to the said contentio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top