2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17096
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
MALA DHANALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 36240/2025
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:61282
APHC010706252025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3208]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 36240/2025
Between:
1. M ALA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O BHEEMESH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
OCC. SARPANCH, R/O S.C. COLONY, SANTHEKUDLUR VILLAGE,
ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS. SPECIAL CHIEF
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (LANDS IV)
DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI- 522238
2. T HE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA
PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503
3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL -
518002
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more
particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare 1st Respondents
Government Crder Rt. No.1503, dated 27/11/2025 as illegal, arbitrary, pre-
determined and unconstitutional and consequently set-aside the 1st
Respondents Government Order Rt. No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV)
Department dated 27/11/2025 and be pleased to pass
##PAGE2##-2-
W.P. No.36240 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61282
Date of order:29.12.2025
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to stay all further proceeding in furtherance of 1st Respondents
Government Order Rt. No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV) Department dated
27/11/2025 and be pleased to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DHANUNJAYA BARU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##-3-
W.P. No.36240 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61282
Date of order:29.12.2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.36240 OF 2025
ORDER
1. The writ petition is filed declaring the G.O.Rt.No.1503 Revenue
(Lands.IV) Department, dt.27.11.2025 is contrary to the Rules more
specifically Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh District (Formation) Rules
1984 [for short „the Rules, 1984’].
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant
Public Prosecutor for Revenue appearing for respondents.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in
fact, in the impugned G.O., the Government has already decided for
bifurcation of Adoni Mandal into two Mandals, Adoni Revenue Division,
Kurnool District, for better administration of the areas concerned. The
said action is contrary to Rule 3 of the Rules 1984. For better
appreciation, Rule 3 is as follows:
“(3) In matters concerning sub-section (1) or sub-section (2)
of Section 3 of the Acts the Collector concerned shall
forward to the Government his report with his views
together with the record of enquiry if any for the
consideration of the Government. If after such
consideration the Government so decides, a preliminary
notification under sub-section(5) of Section 3 of the Act
inviting objections or suggestions to the proposals from
the persons residing in the area/ areas which are likely
to be affected thereby, shall be issued.”
##PAGE4##-4-
W.P. No.36240 OF20 2250:2A5P HC:61282
Date of order:29.12.2025
4. On a perusal of the above Rule, it contemplates a report from the
District Collector and consequent on receipt of the report from the
District Collector, the Government so desires and decides for
bifurcation, a preliminary notification under sub-Section (5) of Section 3
of the Act, inviting objections or suggestions to the proposals from the
persons residing in the area/ areas which are likely to be affected
thereby, would be issued. But, in the instant case, on a perusal of the
G.O.Rt.No.1503, Revenue (Lands-IV) Department, dt.27.11.2025, the
Government has not referred any report of the District Collector.
5. Replying to the said contentio