HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NINALA JAYASURYA
Chunchu Venkata sudhakar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WP 16638/2018
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:58981
APHC010353352018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.16638 OF 2018
Between:
1. Chunchu Venkata sudhakar, S/o late Venkatayya, 38 years,
Service, r/o Bestavaripeta village and Mandal, Prakasam District,
and others.
...Petitioners
AND
1. Union of India, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Transport
and National Highways, New Delhi, and others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr.Naram Nageswara Rao
Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Revenue
The Court made the following ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the
respondent Nos.3 to 6 in not considering the objections made by the
petitioners against the preliminary Notification dated 07.3.2018 and the
subsequent Notification dated 09.3.2018 issued by the respondent No.3
in respect of the subject matter lands as illegal, arbitrary etc., and for
consequential directions.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through online
made submissions with reference to the averments made in the writ
affidavit. He submits that the petitioners are residents of Bestavaripeta
Village and eking out their livelihood by business in the said Village. He
##PAGE2##2 2025:APHC:58981
submits that in view of the extension of NH-544D road, which is passing
through the middle of the said Village, the businesses of the petitioners
were seriously affected and under those circumstances, the petitioners
submitted their objections on 24.2.2018. He submits that without
considering the said objections, the respondent No.3 issued Proceedings
dated 07.3.2018 and 09.3.2018. He submits that thereafter the
respondent Authorities issued another Notification dated 18.4.2018 under
Section 3(G)(3) of the National Highways Act, 1956, and under the said
circumstances, the petitioners are constrained to file the present writ
petition. He submits that as the objections of the petitioners are not
properly considered, the impugned Proceedings are liable to be set aside.
3. On the other hand, Mr.K.Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant
Government Pleader made submissions with reference to the detailed
counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.4, to which no reply affidavit is
filed. Drawing the attention of this Court to the impugned Proceedings,
he submits that the objections of the petitioners were duly examined and
as the acquisition of the land for providing bypass road to NH-544D,
which is in the public interest, is inevitable, the proceedings in terms of
the National Highways Act were initiated. He also submits that as stated
in the impugned Proceedings, the petitioners would be entitled for
payment of compensation and if at all they have any grievance, they have
to work out their remedies as provided under the National Highways Act.
He submits that the writ petition is devoid of merits and liable to be
dismissed.
4. Considered the submissions made and perused the material on
record. As seen from the impugned Proceedings, the respondent No.3
while referring to the objections raised by the petitioners and taking into
account the remarks submitted by the respondent No.6, rejected the
objections of the petitioners, more particularly in view of the fact that
##PAGE3##3 2025:APHC:58981
acquisition of the land is in the public interest i.e., laying of bypass road.
Therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that
the objections raised by the petitioners are not considered, cannot be
accepted. Further, it is settled law that the interest of public at large will
prevail over the private interest. In the aforesaid view of the matter, this
Court see no ground to interfere with the impugned Proceedings and the
writ petition is liable to be dismissed. If the petitioners have any
grievance with regard to determination of compensation, they can work
out their remedies in accordance with the provisions o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.