2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17327
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NYAPATHY VIJAY
D V N JANIKI LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 36099/2025
##PAGE1##
1
2025:APHC:58486
APHC010703692025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3460]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 36099/2025
Between:
1. D V N JANIKI LAKSHMI, W/O BHUJANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49
YEARS, WORKING AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRADE-ILL,
NANDAMURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, PEDANA MANDAL, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.521369
2. S .V. RADHIKA,, W/O KRISHNA MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
WORKING AS A PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRADE-ILL,
PERIKIGUDEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, MANDAVALLI MANDAL, ELURU
DISTRICT.521345
3. M . KONDALU,, S/O JAYABABU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. WORKING
AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRADE III, GANAVARAM GRAM
PANCHAYAT, MANDAVALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.521345
4. J . GIRIJA,, D/O RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, WORKING AS
PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRADE III, KORAGUNTAPALEM GRAM
PANCHAYAT, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL,ELURU DISTRICT. 521329
5. N . LALITHA KUMARI,, D/O VEERA RAGHAVULU, AGED ABOUT 35
YEARS. WORKING AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRADE III, PEDA
LANKA GRAM PANCHAYAT, KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU
##PAGE2##2
2025:APHC:58486
DISTRICT.521344
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS.. PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATH RAJ AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI.522237.
2. T HE COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ, RURAL DEVELOPMENT,
PVR VIKAS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522501.
3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM,KRISHNA DISTRICT.
521002
4. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. (ERST
WHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT)534006
5. T HE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.521001
6. T HE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, ELURU,ELURU DISTRICT.
ERST WHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.534006
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the
nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned action of respondents
in non considering the case of the petitioners for promotions to the post of
Panchayat Secretaries Grade-11 in Zone-11 as per their seniority on the ground
of pendency of disciplinary proceedings issued in Charge Memo No.40870-
2/A2/2023 dt. 14-08-2023 inspite of submitting report by the enquiry officer
dt.21-03-2025 for not proving the charges and not passing final orders which is
highly arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14,16 and 21 of Constitution of
##PAGE3##3
2025:APHC:58486
India and Contrary to the Circulars vide Memo No.35676/Ser.C./1998-1,
G.A(Ser.C) dt.01-07-1998 and Memo No.24637/Ser.C./2000-2 GA(ser.C) dt.05-
09-2000 and G.O.No. and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in
the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to direct the respondents to consider for promotion to next level cadre
post of Panchayat Secretary Grade-ll as per G.O.Ms.No.257 General
Adminstration(Ser.C) Director, dt. 10-06-1999 as per law without referring the
pending departmental proceedings Vide Charge Memo. No.40870-3/A2/2023,
dt. 14-08-2023 to the 1st petitioner. Vide Charge Memo. No.40870-3/A5/2023,
dt. 14-08-2023 to the 2nd petitioner. Vide Charge Memo. No.40870-1/A5/2023,
dt. 14-08-2023 to the 3rd petitioner. Vide Charge Memo. No.40870-4/A2/2023,
dt. 14-08-2023 to the 4th petitioner. Vide Charge Memo. No.40870-3/A2/2023,
dt. 14-08-2023 to the 5th petitioner issued by the 4th respondent and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
##PAGE4##4
2025:APHC:58486
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.36099 of 2025
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the
Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioners for promotion
to the post of Panchayat Secretaries Grade II (Zone II), as illegal an