HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Gorli Arjuna – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRLP 11009/2025
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:57802
APHC010567432025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3521]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos: 11009 & 11011 of 2025
Crl.P.No.11009 of 2025
Between:
1.GORLI ARJUNA, WATER SERVICING CENTRE, RAVANAPALLI
VILLAGE,GOLUGONDA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT
2.SINGAMPALLI DURGA PRASAD, CULTIVATION, RAVANAPALLI
VILLAGE,GOLUGONDA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, represented by its Public
Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Amaravathi
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Crl.P.No.11011 of 2025
Between:
1.GORLI GANGUNAIDU ALIAS CHINNA, RAVANAPALLI VILLAGE,
GOLUGONDA MANDALANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, represented by its Public
Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Amaravathi.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.PARDHA SARADHI A V
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
##PAGE2##2
Dr2.0Y2L5R:A,JPHC:57802
Crl.P.Nos.11009&11011of2025
Dated24.12.2025
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NOs: 11009 and 11011 of 2025
COMMON ORDER
These two Criminal Petitions are heard and disposed of by this common
order as the case is arising from same crime, but the petitioners are different.
2. The Criminal Petitions have been filed under Section 480 and 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to
enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 6 and 7 on bail in Crime No.208 of
2025 of Payakaraopeta Police Station, Anakapalli District, registered against
the petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 6 and 7 herein for the offences punishable
under Sections 20(b)(ii) (c) read with Section 8 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant
Public Prosecutor.
4. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners, who are arrayed as
Accused Nos. 2, 6, and 7 in the above crime, are alleged to have been
involved in the illegal possession and transportation of 200 kilograms of ganja,
which is, undoubtedly, a commercial quantity under provisions of ‘the NDPS
Act.’ The role of the petitioners came to light based on the confession of
Accused No. 2. It is further revealed that three NDPS cases i.e., Cr.No.181 of
2024 in Tangutur Police Station, Cr.No.32 of 2023 in Payakaraopeta Police
Station and Cr.No.262 of 2020 in Golugonda Police Station and one IPC case
##PAGE3##3
Dr2.0Y2L5R:A,JPHC:57802
Crl.P.Nos.11009&11011of2025
Dated24.12.2025
i.e., Cr.No.241 of 2020 of Golugonda Police Station are registered against
Accused No. 2, while two NDPS cases i.e., Cr.No.122 of 2023 in
Narasipatnam Rural Police Station and Cr.No. 24 of 2020 in Golugonda Police
Station and one under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for
brevity ‘the I.P.C.,’) case i.e., Cr.No.262 of 2020 in Golugonda Police Station
are registered against Accused No. 6. However, no adverse antecedents have
been reported against Accused No.7. The petitioners were arrested on
02.09.2025. They have been in judicial custody for the past 113 days only.
5. Sri A.V.Pardha Saradhi, learned Counsel for the Petitioners/Accused
Nos.2, 6 and 7 submits that the Petitioners are innocent and have been falsely
implicated. Accused No.2 is only shown as absconding in the FIR dated
18.08.2025, without any allegation of conscious possession or transportation
of contraband, while Accused Nos.6 and 7 are not even named therein. The
prosecution relies solely on confessional statements of co accused, which are
inadmissible in view of Tofan Singh v. State of T.N, 1(2021)4SCC1 and‑ Narcotics Control
Bureau v. Pallulabid Ahmad Arimutta2. At no point were the Petitioners
found in possession of contraband, and the seizure report itself shows that the
bundles contained flowers, buds and stems, not the flowering or fruiting tops
of cannabis, and thus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.