HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
YALAMANCHILI RAGHU RAM CHANDRA RAO – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 26073/2025
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:56979
APHC010498852025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3332]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 26073/2025
Between:
1. YALAMANCHILI RAGHU RAM CHANDRA RAO, S/O. APPARAO,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O, 72, CH. NAGAPURAM VILLAGE ( R
),CHIDIKADA, GOLUGONDAMANDAL,ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
3. THE ASSISTAMT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT,
NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
4. THE DEPUTY EECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ
DEPARTMENT, NARSIPATNAM, ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT.
5. CH NAGAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT
SECRETARY, CH NAGAPURAM VILLAGE. HABITATION OF
CHEEDIKADA GRAM PANCHAYATH, GOLUGONDA MANDAL,
ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
6. THE TAHSILDAR, GOLUGONDA, GOLUGONDA MANDAL,
ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
##PAGE2##2025:APHC:56979
7. SENAPATHI SATHIBABU, S/O. KONDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 45
YEAIRS, R/O, L-115,CH. NAGAPURAM VILLAGE ( R ),CHIDIKADA,
GOLUGONDAMANDALJANANKAPALLI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more
particularly one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS by declaring the action of
the respondents in not removing the unauthorized construction on a notified
water body which is known as 'SirrapalliVaniCheruvu' or PaniCheruvu,' in an
extent of Ac.3.61 cents situated in Sy No. 70 in the Ch. Nagapuram village,
mandal district as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. And consequently
direct the respondents more particularly the respondent to remove the
unauthorized construction on a notified water body which is known as
'SirrapalliVaniCheruvu' or 'PaniCheruvu,' in an extent of Ac.3.61 cents
situated in Sy No. 70 in the Ch. Nagapuram village, GolugundaMandal,
Anakapalli District. And to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to direct, the respondents not to make any further constructions in
the on a notified water body which is known as “SirrapalliVaniCheruvu” or
“PaniCheruvu,” in an extent of Ac.3.61 cents situated in Sy No. 70 in the Ch.
Nagapuram village, GolugundaMandal, Anakapalli District. Pending disposal
of the above writ petition and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to amend the affidavit para no:1 As “I submit that I am the
Petitioner herein and I am Sarpanch of Ch. Nagapuram village, Golugonda
Mandal, Anakapalli District and as such I am well acquainted with the facts of
the case. INSTEAD OF “ I submit that I am the Petitioner herein and as such I
am well acquainted with the facts of the case. ” in the above Writ Petition No.
26073 Of 2025 and pass
##PAGE3##2025:APHC:56979
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NANILU NAIDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja
Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra
The Court made the following:
##PAGE4##2025:APHC:56979
ORDER
The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities are
not removing unauthorized construction made by respondent no.7 on notified
water body known as Sirrapallivani Cheruvu or Panicheruvu in an extent of
Ac.3-61 cents situated in Survey No.70 of Ch.Nagapuram Village.
2. Despite giving sufficient time the authorities did neither get
instructions nor file counter.
3. The relief sought is innocuous for removal of unauthorized
constructions made by respondent no.7 on water body. A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.