SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17550

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
MALLADI SHYAM SUNDAR RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 26990/2025



##PAGE1##

2025:APHC:63224

APHC010524542025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3332]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 26990/2025

Between:

1. MALLADI SHYAM SUNDAR RAO, S/O.MALLADI KRISHNA MURTHY,

AGED 50 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT D.NO 27-3-124/1, OFFICIAL

COLONY, SRI NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

2. ADARI BHASKARA RAO, S/O.ADARI KANNA RAO, AGED 48 YEARS,

HINDU, RESIDING AT DOOR NO 65-6-734/A, HIMACHAL NAGAR,

SRIHARIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. DIVI BHANUMATHI, W/O.DIVI RAMAKRIHSHMACHARYULU, AGED

65 YEARS. RESIDING AT DOOR NO 1-6-42, PURUSHOTHAMAVARI

STREET, WARD NO.8, NAZARPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

4. SURYAPRABHA PATRO, W/O.GIRIJA SHANKAR PATRO, AGED 66

YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT DOOR NO 51-8-40-19/11, FLAT

NO.303, CHEKURI MANSIONS, K.R.M.COLONY,

SEETHAMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

5. BASHYAM RAMESH BABU, S/O.BASHYAM

VENKATARAMACHARYULU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. RESIDING

AT DOOR NO. 18-56, H.B.COLONY, POTHINAMALLAYAPALEM,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

6. GULLA DALI NAIDU, S/O.GULLA RAMUNAIDU, AGED ABOUT 53

YEARS. RESIDING AT DOOR NO.24-104-9, GONTHINAVANIPALEM,

PEDAGANTYADA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

##PAGE2##

2025:APHC:63224

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,

ARNARAVATI

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT,

VIZIANAGARAM.

3. THE BONDEPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS

SECRETARY, BONDEPALLI VILLAGE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT

4. THE TAHSILDAR, BONDEPALLI MANDAL, BONDEPALLI,

VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

5. SMT BOUROTHU SWATHI, W/O.NADANGANA ANIL KUMAR, AGED

ABOUT 38 YEARS. RESIDING AT BANDARU STREET, NEAR

RAMALAYAM, BONDAPALLI VILLAGE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased topleased to issue order, writ or direction more particularly one in the

nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in

allowing the construction of a place of worship, more particularly a church at

Plot No.45 of Sai Krupa Nagar Layout at Sy.Nos.528/12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23,

24, 29, 30, 31 and 32 of Bondapalli Village and Mandal, Vizianagaram

District as being illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, violative of Rule 26 of the A.P.

Gram Panchayat Land Development (Layout and Building) Rues, 2002 and

unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondents not to allow

construction of a place of worship at plot no 45 of Sai Krupa Nagar Layout at

Sy.Nos.528/12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 24, 29, 30, 31 and 32 of Bondapalli Village

and Mandal, Vizianagaram District and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

##PAGE3##

2025:APHC:63224

pleased to direct the respondents to not to allow constructions, in gross

violation of Rule 26 of the A.P. Gram Panchayat Land Development (Layout

and Building) Rues, 2002 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to

pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representations dated

21.07.2025 and 20.08.2025, made by the petitioners pending disposal of the

above writ petition and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI

The Court made the following:

##PAGE4##

2025:APHC:63224

ORDER

The grievance of the petitioners is that respondent no.2 is allowing

construction of a place of worship-church, at Plot No.45 of Sai Krupa nagar

Layout at Survey Nos.528/12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 24, 29, 30, 31 & 32 of

Bondapalli village and Mandal, Vizianagaram D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top