HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Beera Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 2439/2025
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:57639
APHC010048102025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3332]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2439/2025
Between:
Beera Suresh, ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH NAGA MEHAR BABA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
The Court made the following order:
The short grievance of the petitioner herein is non-consideration of his
representation dated 06.01.2025 submitted against the erecting of unauthorized
statue in between the wall and B.R.Ambedkar Statue in K.Pedapudi Gram
Panchayat, Ambajipeta Mandal, East Godavari District without any permission.
2. Heard Sri Ch.N.Mehar Baba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
Y.Koteswara Rao, learned Standing counsel for Gram Panchayat.
##PAGE2##2025:APHC:57639
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in elaboration to what has been stated
in the affidavit contended that, inspite of making representation dated
06.01.2025 to the Gram Panchayat that some persons are trying to erect
unauthorized statue on the road between the wall and B.R.Ambedkar Statue
without obtaining prior permission, the authorities have not acted upon. As
such filed the present writ petition and accordingly prayed to pass appropriate
orders in that regard.
4. On the other hand, learned Standing counsel for Gram Panchayat
submitted that, the authorities would consider and pass orders on the
petitioners’ representation, in accordance law and prayed to pass appropriate
orders in that regard.
5. Perused the record and considered the submissions of both the learned
counsel.
6. As some persons are trying to erect an unauthorized statue on the road
between the wall and B.R.Ambedkar Statue without obtaining prior permission,
the petitioner’s society has made representation dated 06.01.2025 requesting to
take steps in removing the said unauthorized obstacles but the authorities have
not initiated any action against the same. As per the G.O.Ms.No.18 Panchayat
Raj & Rural Development dated 18.02.2013 prohibits granting permission for
erecting statues, memorials, or constructing structures on public
roads/pavements, with exceptions for essential items like street lights.
##PAGE3##2025:APHC:57639
7. In view of the above provision and as the respondent authorities have
stated that, they would consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation in
accordance with law, instead of adjudicating the matter on merits, this Court is
inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following direction:
The Gram Panchayat concerned is directed to consider and dispose of
the petitioner’s representation dated 06.01.2025 by passing a reasoned order,
in accordance with law and keeping in view G.O.Ms.No.18 dated 18.02.2013,
by providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners and
communicate the same to the petitioners.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
BRS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.