SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17606

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY,Tuhin Kumar Gedela
M/s.Associated Auto Motives – Appellant
Versus
.M/s.Canara Bank (Formerly Syndicate Bank) – Respondent


ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

Aggrieved by the order dated 06.03.2025 passed in O.A.No.725 of 2002 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, whereby the claim of the applicant therein, which is Canara Bank represented by its Manager, Buckinghampet Branch, Vijayawada, for recovery of a sum of Rs.21,99,270/-, was allowed against defendant Nos.1 to 4 therein and Recovery Certificate was issued for the said sum of Rs.21,99,270/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum, while dismissing the claim against defendant No.5, the present writ petition has been filed by defendant No.1 in the said O.A.

2. Heard Mr. S.S. Prasad, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S.N. Chidambara Sastry, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M. Prudvi Raju, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. V.

Veerabhadra Chary, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

3. The parties will be referred as they are arrayed in O.A.No.725 of 2002 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal for the sake of convenience.

4. Brief overview of the facts leading to the lis in this writ petition may be stated as follows:

(i) The applicant before the Tribunal is Canara Bank represented by its Man

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top